Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075806›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Testing the effectiveness and implementation of a brief version of the Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) in Ukraine: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Laura K Murray, Emily E Haroz, Benjamin Doty, Namrita S Singh, Sergey Bogdanov, Judith Bass, Shannon Dorsey, Paul Bolton

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03058302 (Study of Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Versions of the CETA Mental Health Intervention Among Internally Displaced Persons), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03058302 nacompletednot on this map

Study of Effectiveness and Implementation of Different Versions of the CETA Mental Health Intervention Among Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and Veterans in Ukraine

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2017 to 2019Enrolled302ConditionsDepression, PostTraumatic Stress DisorderArmsCETA (Common Elements Treatment Approach)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura K MurrayDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. lmurra15@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0199-9701
Emily E HarozDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Benjamin DotyDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Namrita S SinghDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Sergey BogdanovCentre for Mental Health and Psychosocial Support, National University Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Glasunova str 2/4, Kyiv, 01042, Ukraine.
Judith BassDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Shannon DorseyDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Guthrie Hall (GTH), 119A 98195-1525, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Paul BoltonDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.

Funding

Global Mental Health Training ProgramT32MH103210 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Judith Karen Bass, Sarah Sutherlin-McIvor Murray · 2015 to 2026
$4.0M
SuSt-AInS: Sustainment of suicide prevention programs in American Indian SettingsK01MH116335 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAROZ, EMILY · 2018 to 2022
$733k
National Institute of Mental Health T32MH103210NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH116335NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH103210United States Agency for International Development AID-OAA-LA-15-00003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental illness is a major public health concern. Despite progress understanding which treatments work, a significant treatment gap remains. An ongoing concern is treatment length. Modular, flexible, transdiagnostic approaches have been offered as one solution to scalability challenges. The Common Elements Treatment Approach (CETA) is one such approach and offers the ability to treat a wide range of common mental health problems. CETA is supported by two randomized trials from low- and middle-income countries showing strong effectiveness and implementation outcomes. METHODS/

designThis trial evaluates the effectiveness and implementation of two versions of CETA using a non-inferiority design to test two primary hypotheses: (1) a brief five-session version of CETA (Brief CETA) will provide similar effectiveness for reducing the severity of common mental health problems such as depression, post-traumatic stress, impaired functioning, anxiety, and substance use problems compared with the standard 8-12-session version of CETA (Standard CETA); and (2) both Brief and Standard CETA will have superior impact on the outcomes compared to a wait-list control condition. For both hypotheses, the main effect will be assessed using longitudinal data and mixed-effects regression models over a 6-month period post baseline. A secondary aim includes exploration of implementation factors. Additional planned analyses will include exploration of: moderators of treatment impact by disorder severity and comorbidity; the impact of individual therapeutic components; and trends in symptom change between end of treatment and 6-month assessment for all participants. DISCUSSION: This trial is the first rigorous study comparing a standard-length (8-12 sessions) modular, flexible, transdiagnostic, cognitive-behavioral approach to a shortened version of the approach (five sessions). Brief CETA entails "front-loading" with elements that research suggests are strong mechanisms of change. The study design will allow us to draw conclusions about the effects of both Brief and Standard CETA as well as which elements are integral to their mechanisms of action, informing future implementation and fidelity efforts. The results from this trial will inform future dissemination, implementation and scale-up of CETA in Ukraine and contribute to our understanding of the effects of modular, flexible, transdiagnostic approaches in similar contexts.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03058302 (U.S. National Library of Medicine). Registered on 20 February 2017.

Indexed as

Mental HealthCognitive Behavioral TherapyComorbidityEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMulticenter Studies as TopicPsychotherapy, BriefRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSingle-Blind MethodTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUkraineCognitive-behavioral therapyDepressionGlobal mental healthImplementation researchInternally displaced personsTransdiagnosticTraumaVeterans

Identifiers

PMID30075806
PMCPMC6090833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.