Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075798›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018

A worldwide multicentre evaluation of the influence of deterioration or improvement of acute kidney injury on clinical outcome in critically ill patients with and without sepsis at ICU admission: results from The Intensive Care Over Nations audit.

Esther Peters, Massimo Antonelli, Xavier Wittebole, Rahul Nanchal, Bruno François, Yasser Sakr, Jean-Louis Vincent, Peter Pickkers

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03877081 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Probiotics and Prebiotics in Renal Function in Septic Acute Kidney Injury Patients, Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Civil de GuadalajaraRan2019 to 2023Enrolled90ConditionsAcute Kidney Injury, Probiotics, SepsisArmsProbiotics, Placebo
NCT04507672 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Acetated Ringer's Solution Versus Saline in Patients With Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorSoutheast University, ChinaRan2020 to 2023Enrolled2,000ConditionsSeptic Shock HyperdynamicArmsFluid resuscitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The burden of critical illness in kidney transplant recipients-beyond 1 year post-transplant.Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2026
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Esther PetersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, HP:710, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Intensive Care and Anesthesiology, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Largo A. Gemelli 8, 00168, Rome, Italy.
Xavier WitteboleCritical Care Department, Cliniques universitaires St Luc, UCL, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium.
Rahul NanchalDepartment of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
Bruno FrançoisService de Réanimation Polyvalente, CHU Dupuytren, 2, avenue Martin Luther King, 87042, Limoges cedex, France.
Yasser SakrDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uniklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, route de Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, HP:710, PO Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. peter.pickkers@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1104-4303

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication of critical illness and is associated with worse outcomes. However, the influence of deterioration or improvement in renal function on clinical outcomes is unclear. Using a large international database, we evaluated the prevalence and evolution of AKI over a 7-day period and its effects on clinical outcomes in septic and non-septic critically ill patients worldwide.

methodsFrom the 10,069 adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients in the Intensive Care Over Nations database, all those with creatinine and urine output data were included in this substudy. Patients who developed sepsis during the ICU stay (≥ 2 days after admission) were excluded. AKI was evaluated within 72 hours after admission and before discharge/death up to day 7 according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria.

resultsA total of 7970 patients were included, 59% of whom met AKIN criteria for AKI within the first 72 hours of the ICU stay. Twenty-four per cent of patients had sepsis on admission, of whom 68% had AKI, compared to 57% of those without sepsis on admission (p < 0.001). AKIN stage 3 (40% vs 24%, p < 0.001) and use of renal replacement therapy (20% vs 5%, p < 0.0001) were more prevalent in patients with sepsis. Patients with sepsis and AKIN stage 3 were less likely to improve to a lower stage during the 7-day follow-up period than non-septic patients with AKIN stage 3 (21% vs 32%, p < 0.0001). In-hospital mortality was related to severity of AKI and was reduced in patients in whom AKI improved compared to those who remained stable or deteriorated, but remained higher than in patients without AKI, even if there was apparent full recovery at day 7.

conclusionThese findings illustrate the different kinetics of AKI in septic and non-septic ICU patients and emphasize the important impact of AKI on mortality rates even when there is apparent full renal recovery at day 7.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentAcute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedCritical IllnessFemaleHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresRenal Replacement TherapySepsisCritical care outcomesEpidemiologyRenal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID30075798
PMCPMC6091052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.