Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075792›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2018

Left ventricular systolic function evaluated by strain echocardiography and relationship with mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

F Sanfilippo, C Corredor, N Fletcher, L Tritapepe, F L Lorini, A Arcadipane, A Vieillard-Baron, M Cecconi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Septic cardiomyopathy: Fact or fiction?American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Evaluation and Management of Sepsis in Pulmonary Hypertension.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

F SanfilippoDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy. filipposanfi@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0776
C CorredorDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, Bart's Heart Centre St. Bartholomew's Hospital, W. Smithfield, London, UK.
N FletcherDepartment of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, St Georges University Hospitals NHS Trust, Blackshaw Road, London, SW170QT, UK.
L TritapepeDepartment of Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Nephrological, Anaesthetic and Geriatric Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
F L LoriniDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.
A ArcadipaneDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), Via Tricomi 5, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
A Vieillard-BaronAssistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, University Hospital Ambroise Paré, Intensive Care Unit, Section Thorax-Vascular Disease-Abdomen-Metabolism, 92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
M CecconiHumanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via A. Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano - Milan, Italy.
Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione · ITHumanitas University · ITInserm · FROspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes, but traditional measurements of systolic function such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) do not directly correlate with prognosis. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) utilizing speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) could be a better marker of intrinsic left ventricular (LV) function, reflecting myocardial deformation rather than displacement and volume changes. We sought to investigate the prognostic value of GLS in patients with sepsis and/or septic shock.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review (PubMed and Embase up to 26 October 2017) and meta-analysis to investigate the association between GLS and mortality at longest follow up in patients with severe sepsis and/or septic shock. In the primary analysis, we included studies reporting transthoracic echocardiography data on GLS according to mortality. A secondary analysis evaluated the association between LVEF and mortality including data from studies reporting GLS.

resultsWe included eight studies in the primary analysis with a total of 794 patients (survival 68%, n = 540). We found a significant association between worse LV function and GLS values and mortality: standard mean difference (SMD) - 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.47, - 0.04; p = 0.02 (low heterogeneity, I

conclusionsWorse GLS (less negative) values are associated with higher mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, while such association is not valid for LVEF. More critical care research is warranted to confirm the better ability of STE in demonstrating underlying intrinsic myocardial disease compared to LVEF.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, StressHumansPrognosisRisk FactorsSepsisStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftGlobal longitudinal strainIntensive careLeft ventricular ejection fractionSpeckle trackingSystolic dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID30075792
PMCPMC6091069
OpenAlexW2885236829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.