Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075728›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2018

A policy analysis exploring hepatitis C risk, prevention, testing, treatment and reinfection within Australia's prisons.

Lise Lafferty, T Cameron Wild, Jake Rance, Carla Treloar

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lise LaffertyCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 2, Goodsell Building, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia. l.lafferty@unsw.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-2957
T Cameron WildSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, 3-300 Edmonton Clinic Health Academy 11405-87 Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Jake RanceCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 2, Goodsell Building, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia.
Carla TreloarCentre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 2, Goodsell Building, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis C (HCV) is a global public health concern. There is a global prevalence of 15% among the world's prisoner population, suggesting the need for priority HCV treatment among this population group. New highly efficacious therapies with low side effects, known as directing-acting antivirals, became available under Australia's universal healthcare scheme on 1 March 2016. This creates an opportune time to trial treatment as prevention as an elimination strategy for HCV in prison settings. This paper examines whether policies in Australian jurisdictions support treatment scale-up to achieve elimination among this priority population.

methodsA comprehensive search was conducted using Google and other web-based search functions to locate all publicly available policies in each Australian state and territory related to HCV health and HCV-related prison health. Ministers (corrections and health) were contacted from each jurisdiction to identify any additional policies. Inductive and deductive analyses were conducted for each jurisdiction, with documents being assessed against a set of four a priori criteria. Documents included in the analysis were current at 1 September 2017, or 18 months following treatment availability.

resultsA total of 18 documents were located, including both health (n = 12) and corrections/prison health (n = 6) documents relevant to HCV. Jurisdictions ranged in their commitments for delivering HCV harm reduction strategies and treatment availability within the prison setting.

conclusionFew jurisdictions have updated or published HCV-related health or prisoner health policies following availability of directing-acting antivirals. Current policies do not provide effective support for implementing treatment scale-up that could be possible under universal access to HCV treatment among this priority population.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAustraliaHarm ReductionHepatitis C, ChronicHumansPrisonersPrisonsRecurrenceRisk FactorsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousHepatitis CPolicy analysisPrisoner healthTreatment as prevention

Identifiers

PMID30075728
PMCPMC6091068
OpenAlexW2886863363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.