Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075723›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2018

Effects of hyperoxia on vascular tone in animal models: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bob Smit, Yvo M Smulders, Etto C Eringa, Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten, Armand R J Girbes, Kimberley E Wever, Carlijn R Hooijmans, Angelique M E Spoelstra-de Man

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Impact of hyperoxia on the gut during critical illnesses.Critical care (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bob SmitDepartment of Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. b.smit@vumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-0862-8014
Yvo M SmuldersDepartment of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Etto C EringaDepartment of Physiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen M Oudemans-van StraatenDepartment of Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Armand R J GirbesDepartment of Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kimberley E WeverSYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Carlijn R HooijmansSYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Angelique M E Spoelstra-de ManDepartment of Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007, MB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

ZonMw 114024107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArterial hyperoxia may induce vasoconstriction and reduce cardiac output, which is particularly undesirable in patients who already have compromised perfusion of vital organs. Due to the inaccessibility of vital organs in humans, vasoconstrictive effects of hyperoxia have primarily been studied in animal models. However, the results of these studies vary substantially. Here, we investigate the variation in magnitude of the hyperoxia effect among studies and explore possible sources of heterogeneity, such as vascular region and animal species.

methodPubmed and Embase were searched for eligible studies up to November 2017. In vivo and ex vivo animal studies reporting on vascular tone changes induced by local or systemic normobaric hyperoxia were included. Experiments with co-interventions (e.g. disease or endothelium removal) or studies focusing on lung, brain or fetal vasculature or the ductus arteriosus were not included. We extracted data pertaining to species, vascular region, blood vessel characteristics and method of hyperoxia induction. Overall effect sizes were estimated with a standardized mean difference (SMD) random effects model.

resultsWe identified a total of 60 studies, which reported data on 67 in vivo and 18 ex vivo experiments. In the in vivo studies, hyperoxia caused vasoconstriction with an SMD of - 1.42 (95% CI - 1.65 to - 1.19). Ex vivo, the overall effect size was SMD - 0.56 (95% CI - 1.09 to - 0.03). Between-study heterogeneity (I

conclusionThe effect of hyperoxia on vascular tone is substantially higher in vivo than ex vivo. The magnitude of the constriction is most pronounced in vessels ~ 15-25 μm in diameter and is proportional to the level of hyperoxia. Relatively increased constriction was seen in muscle vasculature, while reduced constriction was seen in the skin and intestines.

Indexed as

AnimalsArteriesCardiac OutputCatsCricetinaeDisease Models, AnimalHyperoxiaRabbitsRatsVasoconstrictionHyperoxiaMeta-analysisMicrocirculationVasoconstriction

Identifiers

PMID30075723
PMCPMC6091089
OpenAlexW2885056455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.