Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075720›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Promoting physical activity through primary health care: the case of Catalonia.

Angelina Gonzalez-Viana, Mariona Violan Fors, Conxa Castell Abat, Maica Rubinat Masot, Laura Oliveras, Juanjo Garcia-Gil, Antoni Plasencia, Carmen Cabezas Peña, PAFES working group

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angelina Gonzalez-VianaPublic Health Agency of Catalonia, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain. angelina.gonzalez@gencat.cat.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-4039
Mariona Violan ForsSports' General Secretariat, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Conxa Castell AbatPublic Health Agency of Catalonia, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Maica Rubinat MasotSports' General Secretariat, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Laura OliverasDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Juanjo Garcia-GilBlanquerna Health Sciences School, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Antoni PlasenciaInstitute of Global Health Barcelona - IS Global, Barcelona, Spain.
Carmen Cabezas PeñaPublic Health Agency of Catalonia, Government of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
PAFES working group
Generalitat de Catalunya · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ESUniversitat Ramon Llull · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn adults, as little as 10 minutes of moderate physical activity (PA) three times a day can help prevent non-communicable diseases and prolong life expectancy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the process and impact of scaling up a complex intervention (PAFES) implemented in Catalonia, aimed to increase the proportion of adults complying with PA recommendations (especially those with cardiovascular risk factors).

methodsThe intervention, piloted in 2005, had three elements: 1) establishing clinical guidelines for PA; 2) identifying local PA resources; 3) PA screening and advice in primary health care (PHC) settings, based on stage of change. Central and local level implementation activities included training, support to municipalities, dissemination through a web page, and promotion of World Physical Activity Day (WPAD). Evaluation followed the RE-AIM framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance), identifying 3-6 variables for annual evaluation of each dimension. These included coverage of PA screening and advice and individuals with access to a healthy exercise route (Reach), increased PA level between 2006 and 2010-15 (Effectiveness), PAFES adoption by PHC centres and municipalities (Adoption), process evaluation data (Implementation), and cost (Maintenance).

resultsPHC screening coverage increased from 14.4% (2008) to 69.6% (2015) and advice coverage from 8.3% (2012) to 35.6% (2015). In 2015, 82.5% patients had access to a "healthy route" (Reach). The proportion of patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor who were "sufficiently active" increased from 2006 to 2010-2013 (Effectiveness). By 2015, PAFES was applied by all PHC teams, 8.3% municipalities and 22.7% PHC centres had organized WPAD events (Adoption). The Plan showed good penetration in all health regions by 2013, with relatively low use of resources and estimated cost (Implementation). By 2013 the Plan was embedded within the health system (Maintenance).

conclusionsIn the first application of the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the scaling-up of a PA plan, PAFES showed good results for most RE-AIM indicators. Changes in priority and investment in health promotion programs affect reach, adoption, and effectiveness. It is important to maintain support until programs are strongly embedded into the health system.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedExerciseFemaleHealth Plan ImplementationHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsPrimary Health CareProcess Assessment, Health CareProgram EvaluationSpainEvaluationHealth promotionImplementation researchPhysical activityPrimary Health CareProcess evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30075720
PMCPMC6090750
OpenAlexW2887664579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.