Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075711›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Improving the healthcare response to domestic violence and abuse in primary care: protocol for a mixed method evaluation of the implementation of a complex intervention.

Alex Hardip Sohal, Gene Feder, Estela Barbosa, Lee Beresford, Anna Dowrick, Farah El-Shogri, Annie Howell, Natalia Lewis, Medina Johnson, Claire Nightingale and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex Hardip SohalQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England. ahsohal@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-3155
Gene FederSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, England.
Estela BarbosaDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, England.
Lee BeresfordQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Anna DowrickQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Farah El-ShogriQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Annie HowellIRISi, Bristol, England.
Natalia LewisQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Medina JohnsonIRISi, Bristol, England.
Claire NightingaleQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Kambiz BoomlaQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Stephen MorrisDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, England.
Sandra EldridgeQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Chris GriffithsQueen Mary University of London, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, England.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDomestic violence and abuse remains a major health concern. It is unknown whether the improved healthcare response to domestic violence and abuse demonstrated in a cluster randomised controlled trial of IRIS (Identification and Referral to Improve Safety), a complex intervention, including general practice based training, support and referral programme, can be achieved outside a trial setting.

aimTo evaluate the impact over four years of a system wide implementation of IRIS, sequentially into multiple areas, outside the setting of a trial.

methodsAn interrupted time series analysis of referrals received by domestic violence and abuse workers from 201 general practices, in five northeast London boroughs; alongside a mixed methods process evaluation and qualitative analysis. Segmented regression interrupted time series analysis to estimate impact of the IRIS intervention over a 53-month period. A secondary analysis compares the segmented regression analysis in each of the four implementation boroughs, with a fifth comparator borough. DISCUSSION: This is the first interrupted time series analysis of an intervention to improve the health care response to domestic violence. The findings will characterise the impact of IRIS implementation outside a trial setting and its suitability for national implementation in the United Kingdom.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild AbuseCluster AnalysisDomestic ViolenceFemaleGeneral PracticeHealth Plan ImplementationHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisLondonMalePrimary Health CareProcess Assessment, Health CareQualitative ResearchDomestic violence abuse complex intervention implementation evaluation

Identifiers

PMID30075711
PMCPMC6091071
OpenAlexW2887343113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.