Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075699›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2018

Evolutionary dynamics of host specialization in wood-decay fungi.

Franz-Sebastian Krah, Claus Bässler, Christoph Heibl, John Soghigian, Hanno Schaefer, David S Hibbett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Annual Dynamics of Mycobiota in Symptomatic Century-Old Trees ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Franz-Sebastian KrahPlant Biodiversity Research Group, Center for Food and Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany. franz.krah@tum.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7866-7508
Claus BässlerBaverian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany.
Christoph HeiblBaverian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany.
John SoghigianDepartment of Environmental Science, The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA.
Hanno SchaeferPlant Biodiversity Research Group, Center for Food and Life Sciences Weihenstephan, Technische Universität München, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7231-3987
David S HibbettBiology Department, Clark University, Worcester, MA, 01610, USA.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Open Access PublishingNational Science Foundation IOS-1456777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of wood decomposing fungi are mushroom-forming Agaricomycetes, which exhibit two main modes of plant cell wall decomposition: white rot, in which all plant cell wall components are degraded, including lignin, and brown rot, in which lignin is modified but not appreciably removed. Previous studies suggested that brown rot fungi tend to be specialists of gymnosperm hosts and that brown rot promotes gymnosperm specialization. However, these hypotheses were based on analyses of limited datasets of Agaricomycetes. Overcoming this limitation, we used a phylogeny with 1157 species integrating available sequences, assembled decay mode characters from the literature, and coded host specialization using the newly developed R package, rusda.

resultsWe found that most brown rot fungi are generalists or gymnosperm specialists, whereas most white rot fungi are angiosperm specialists. A six-state model of the evolution of host specialization revealed high transition rates between generalism and specialization in both decay modes. However, while white rot lineages switched most frequently to angiosperm specialists, brown rot lineages switched most frequently to generalism. A time-calibrated phylogeny revealed that Agaricomycetes is older than the flowering plants but many of the large clades originated after the diversification of the angiosperms in the Cretaceous.

conclusionsOur results challenge the current view that brown rot fungi are primarily gymnosperm specialists and reveal intensive white rot specialization to angiosperm hosts. We thus suggest that brown rot associated convergent loss of lignocellulose degrading enzymes was correlated with host generalism, rather than gymnosperm specialism. A likelihood model of host specialization evolution together with a time-calibrated phylogeny further suggests that the rise of the angiosperms opened a new mega-niche for wood-decay fungi, which was exploited particularly well by white rot lineages.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionHost-Pathogen InteractionsBasidiomycotaCycadopsidaFruiting Bodies, FungalModels, BiologicalPhylogenySpecies SpecificityWoodBrown rotDecay modeHost specializationR package rusdaWhite rotWood-decay fungi

Identifiers

PMID30075699
PMCPMC6091043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.