ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intelligibility of interrupted and checkerboard speech with two talkers: Further evidence for four speech cue channels.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Attenuation and distortion components of age-related hearing loss: Contributions to recognizing temporal-envelope filtered speech in modulated noise.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Effects of age on brainstem coding of speech glimpses in interrupted noise.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Recognition of spectrally shaped speech in speech-modulated noise: Effects of age, spectral shape, speech level, and vocoding.JASA express letters · 2023Article
- Recognition of Interrupted Speech, Text, and Text-Supplemented Speech by Older Adults: Effect of Interruption Rate.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Evidence for cortical adjustments to perceptual decision criteria during word recognition in noise.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Impacts of signal processing factors on perceptual restoration in cochlear-implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Phonemic restoration in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: a preliminary investigation.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Phonological and semantic similarity of misperceived words in babble: Effects of sentence context, age, and hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Cognitive and linguistic abilities and perceptual restoration of missing speech: Evidence from online assessment.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Corticothalamic projections deliver enhanced responses to medial geniculate body as a function of the temporal reliability of the stimulus.The Journal of physiology · 2021Article
- Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Glimpsing keywords across sentences in noise: A microstructural analysis of acoustic, lexical, and listener factors.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Resetting of Auditory and Visual Segregation Occurs After Transient Stimuli of the Same Modality.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- The effect of fundamental frequency contour similarity on multi-talker listening in older and younger adults.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020Article
- Relationship between Speech Perception in Noise and Phonemic Restoration of Speech in Noise in Individuals with Normal Hearing.Journal of audiology & otology · 2020Article
- Review
- The importance of a broad bandwidth for understanding "glimpsed" speech.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Age effects on the contributions of envelope and periodicity cues to recognition of interrupted speech in quiet and with a competing talker.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Contributions of Voice Expectations to Talker Selection in Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In realistic listening environments, speech perception requires grouping together audible fragments of speech, filling in missing information, and segregating the glimpsed target from the background. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which age-related difficulties with these tasks can be explained by declines in glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and/or speech segregation. Younger and older adults with normal hearing listened to sentences interrupted with silence or envelope-modulated noise, presented either in quiet or with a competing talker. Older adults were poorer than younger adults at recognizing keywords based on short glimpses but benefited more when envelope-modulated noise filled silent intervals. Recognition declined with a competing talker but this effect did not interact with age. Results of cognitive tasks indicated that faster processing speed and better visual-linguistic closure were predictive of better speech understanding. Taken together, these results suggest that age-related declines in speech recognition may be partially explained by difficulty grouping short glimpses of speech into a coherent message.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.