ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Frequency-sum beamforming for passive cavitation imaging.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Passive cavitation imaging with pMedical physics · 2026Article
- Enhancing Passive Cavitation Imaging Using pIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Simultaneous High-Frame-Rate Acoustic Plane-Wave and Optical Imaging of Intracranial Cavitation in Polyacrylamide Brain Phantoms during Blunt Force Impact.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Time-Resolved Passive Cavitation Mapping Using the Transient Angular Spectrum Approach.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Assessment of Collaborative Robot (Cobot)-Assisted Histotripsy for Venous Clot Ablation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Beamforming includes a variety of spatial filtering techniques that may be used for determining sound source locations from near-field sensor array recordings. For this scenario, beamforming resolution depends on the acoustic frequency, array geometry, and target location. Random scattering in the medium between the source and the array may degrade beamforming resolution with higher frequencies being more susceptible to degradation. The performance of frequency-sum (FS) beamforming for reducing such sensitivity to mild scattering while increasing resolution is reported here. FS beamforming was used with a data-dependent [minimum variance (MV)] or data-independent (delay-and-sum, DAS) weight vector to produce higher frequency information from lower frequency signal components via a quadratic product of complex signal amplitudes. The current findings and comparisons are based on simulations and passive cavitation imaging experiments using 3 MHz and 6 MHz emissions recorded by a 128-element linear array. FS beamforming results are compared to conventional DAS and MV beamforming using four metrics: point spread function (PSF) size, axial and lateral contrast, and computation time. FS beamforming produces a smaller PSF than conventional DAS beamforming with less computation time than MV beamforming in free space and mild scattering environments. However, it may fail when multiple unknown sound sources are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.