Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075590›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Association study of gut flora in Wilson's disease through high-throughput sequencing.

Hao Geng, Shan Shu, Jianjian Dong, Hai Li, Chenchen Xu, Yongsheng Han, Jiyuan Hu, Yongzhu Han, Renmin Yang, Nan Cheng

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Changes in Gut Microbiota by theFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hao GengAnhui University of Chinese Medicine The Affiliated Hospital of the Neurology Institute of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Shan Shu
Jianjian Dong
Hai Li
Chenchen Xu
Yongsheng Han
Jiyuan Hu
Yongzhu Han
Renmin Yang
Nan Cheng
Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the difference of intestinal flora polymorphisms between Wilson's disease (WD) patients and healthy people by high-throughput sequencing technology, and explored the correlation between WD and intestinal flora polymorphism.A total of 22 cases of WD patients and 22 healthy persons as control were recruited. The total DNA was extracted from the fecal specimens of all the subjects, V4 high variable region of 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced by high-throughput sequencing. The sequencing results were analyzed by α diversity and β diversity. The unweighted UniFrac distance matrices were calculated and trees were built by unweighted-pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA).A total of 2,548,262 sequences were obtained after the data are optimized, the average sequences in the WD group was 36,836 ± 4104 and it was 35,051 ± 3075 in the normal control group, there was no significant difference in the average sequence number between the 2 groups. OTU analysis showed that 2663 OTU were obtained in WD group, and 3271 OTU were obtained in the control group, of which 941 were common OTU. Colony diversity analysis showed that the intestinal flora of WD group and control group belonged to 5 phyla, they were Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Fusobacteria, and Tenericutes, respectively. In WD group, the abundance of Bacteroidetes was significantly lower than that of the control group (67.19% vs 76.75%, P < .001), and the abundance of Firmicutes (26.18% vs 19.83%, P < .001), Proteobacteria (4.31% vs 3.09%, P < .05), Fusobacteria (1.88% vs 0.04%, P < .001) were significantly higher than that of control group. Compared with the control group at the level of the genus, the abundance of Bacteroides (4.85% vs 4.6%, P < .05), Faecalibacterium (2.92% vs 2.13%, P < .05), Megamonas (0.84% vs 0.22%, P < .001), Lachnospira (0.16% vs 0.09%, P < .001) significantly increased in WD group, while the abundance of Prevotella (1.63% vs 2.48%, P < .001), Roseburia (0.75% vs 1.39%, P < .001) and Phascolarctobacterium (1.72% vs 2.45%, P < .001) significantly decreased in WD group. PCoA and UPGMA tree analysis showed that there were significant differences of gut microbial compositions between the 2 groups.The diversity and composition of intestinal flora in the WD patients were significantly lower than those in the healthy controls, and the diversity of intestinal flora may be associated with the presence of WD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCeruloplasminChildCopperFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHepatolenticular DegenerationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiver Function TestsMalePolymorphism, GeneticRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAYoung AdultCeruloplasminCopperRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30075590
PMCPMC6081054
OpenAlexW2885350602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.