Trial reportMedicine2018
One-year outcomes of fixed treatment of intravitreal aflibercept for exudative age-related macular degeneration and the factor of visual prognosis.
Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of periodic intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) in exudative age-related macular degeneration, and to explore the predictive factors for visual outcome.This is a prospective interventional case series.Fifty-two eyes of 52 treatment-naïve age-related-macula-degeneration patients were enrolled. All participants received IVA bimonthly following 3 monthly loading dose. The primary endpoint was change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT), and the secondary outcomes included changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT), macular atrophy (MA), and retinal average sensitivity (AS) determined by microperimetry at 12 months compared with baseline. The predictive factors for the change of BCVA were examined.Of 52 enrolled patients, 4 patients were drop out. Remaining 48 patients were examined. Mean logMAR BCVA significantly improved from 0.42 ± 0.37 at baseline to 0.29 ± 0.34 at 12 months (P = .008). Mean CRT and SCT significant reduced from 285.6 ± 135.2 μm, 247.9 ± 96.7 μm at baseline to 233.4 ± 98.0 μm, 208.1 ± 94.6 μm at 12 months, respectively (P < .001). At 12 months, 35 eyes of 48 eyes (72.3%) were archived dry macula. MA occurred in 7 eyes of 35 eyes with dry macula at 12 months (20.0%). AS was significant improved (P = .027) between baseline (median: 15.7 dB) and 12 months (median: 19.5 dB). The BCVA of the cases with MA involved fovea was significant worse. Age was significantly predicted for the BCVA at 12 months.IVA administered over 1 year improved BCVA, AS, and morphological findings, and the predictive factors for BCVA were age and MA-involved fovea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.