ArticleMedicine2018
A retrospective study of Yiqibushenhuoxue decoction for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study aimed to investigate the effect and safety of Yiqibushenhuoxue decoction (YQBSHXD) for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).This study involved 120 cases of patients with COPD. These cases were assigned to an intervention group and a control group equally, 60 subjects each group. Patients in both groups underwent Salmeterol. In addition, the cases in the intervention group also received YQBSHXD. All cases received a total of 12 weeks treatment. The primary outcome of lung function was measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC). The secondary outcomes included severity of dyspnea on exertion, evaluated by 6-minute walk test (6MWT) with measurement of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD); and quality of life, assessed by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). In addition, adverse events (AEs) were also recorded in this study. All outcome measurements were assessed before and after 12-week treatment.After 12-week treatment, cases in the intervention group underwent YQBSHXD did not show better outcome in lung function improvement, measured by the FEV1 (P = .11), and FEV1/FVC (P = .15), compared with those in the control group. However, YQBSHXD may help to alleviate the severity of dyspnea on exertion, as measured by 6MWD (P = .03), and to improve the quality of life, as assessed by the SGRQ (P < .01). Additionally, no significant differences in AEs were detected between the 2 groups.The results of this study showed that YQBSHXD may help to manage COPD after 12-week treatment, although the lung function has not been improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.