Observational studyMedicine2018

Chinese herbal products and the reduction of risk of breast cancer among females with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan: A case-control study.

Chien-Tung Wu, Yueh-Ting Tsai, Jaung-Geng Lin, Shu-Ling Fu, Jung-Nien Lai

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph read 2 numbers from its abstract, feeding 2 cells of the map: it favours the comparator in 1. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

2numbers the graph read from it
2cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.250.51 · no effect
Adverse events & safetyfavours the treatment · head-to-head · t2dfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.350.23 to 0.51
For the effect of metformin, women who used traditional Chinese medicine including Di Huang series have a lower risk of breast cancer HR: 0.35 (95%CI: 0.23-0.51) in women younger than 55 and HR: 0.54 (95%CI: 0.37-0.79) in women older than 55.The protective effect of the Di Huang Wan series may be due to the synergetic effect of reducing blood glucose or increasing insulin sensitivity and delaying the insulin resistance of cells.
Adverse events & safetyfavours the treatment · head-to-head · t2dfeeds 2 cells of the map
HR 0.540.37 to 0.79
For the effect of metformin, women who used traditional Chinese medicine including Di Huang series have a lower risk of breast cancer HR: 0.35 (95%CI: 0.23-0.51) in women younger than 55 and HR: 0.54 (95%CI: 0.37-0.79) in women older than 55.The protective effect of the Di Huang Wan series may be due to the synergetic effect of reducing blood glucose or increasing insulin sensitivity and delaying the insulin resistance of cells.

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×adverse events & safety

No readable resultOpen on the map →What to test next →

22 readable studies in this cell: 9 favour the treatment, 8 find no difference, 5 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.27contested · 4 families support, 11 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0 · no effect
NCT017190031,413 enrolled · 2012
Adjusted mean -0.72-0.95 to -0.48
NCT018093271,186 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.40-0.59 to -0.21
NCT022730501,136 enrolled · 2014
Δ -8.90-13.3 to -4.50
NCT01126580807 enrolled · 2010
Δ -0.22-0.36 to -0.08
NCT01023581784 enrolled · 2009
Δ -0.67-0.96 to -0.37
NCT00386100688 enrolled · 2006
Δ 1.47-14.8 to 20.8
NCT01217073685 enrolled · 2010
Δ 1.00-9.80 to 13.1
NCT01890122647 enrolled · 2013
Δ -0.68-0.89 to -0.47
NCT00727857600 enrolled · 2007
Δ 0.860.51 to 1.22
NCT01958671461 enrolled · 2013
Δ -2.60-13.1 to 8.10
NCT00328172302 enrolled · 2006
Δ -0.85-1.10 to -0.59
NCT01485614200 enrolled · 2012
Δ 2.40-10.0 to 14.9

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

Supplements & botanicals×adverse events & safety

ContradictsOpen on the map →What to test next →

No other readable study in this cell yet. This paper is the evidence.

Belief with this paperNo claim has been compiled for this cell yet.
4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chien-Tung WuInstitute of Traditional Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University Department of Chinese Medicine, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei School of Chinese Medicine Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine Department of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Yueh-Ting Tsai
Jaung-Geng Lin
Shu-Ling Fu
Jung-Nien Lai
China Medical University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Women with type 2 diabetes have a higher risk of developing breast cancer. In Taiwan, traditional Chinese medicine is widely used to treat diabetes; however, its precise influence has not been empirically tested.The objective of the case-control study is to estimate the effect on the risk of breast cancer of using traditional Chinese medicine for women with type 2 diabetes.More than 80% of women with type 2 diabetes have used traditional Chinese medicine. The most commonly prescribed drug was metformin and the herbal formulas were the Di Huang Wan series, including Liu Wei Di Huang Wan, Qi Ju Di Huang Wan, and Zhi Bai Di Huang Wan, followed by Bai Hu Jia Ren Shen Tang and Yu Quan Wan. For the effect of metformin, women who used traditional Chinese medicine including Di Huang series have a lower risk of breast cancer HR: 0.35 (95%CI: 0.23-0.51) in women younger than 55 and HR: 0.54 (95%CI: 0.37-0.79) in women older than 55.The protective effect of the Di Huang Wan series may be due to the synergetic effect of reducing blood glucose or increasing insulin sensitivity and delaying the insulin resistance of cells. The relationship between the Di Huang Wan series and breast cancer of women with type 2 diabetes requires further investigation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drugs, Chinese HerbalDrug Therapy, CombinationDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsTaiwanYoung AdultDrugs, Chinese HerbalHypoglycemic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID30075530
PMCPMC6081140
OpenAlexW2886763906

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.