Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075523›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2018

Oxycodone versus sufentanil in adult patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after abdominal surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multiple-center clinical trial.

Lichun Han, Yuqiang Su, Hongfei Xiong, Xiaoli Niu, Shajie Dang, Keqin Du, Quan Li, Jing Liu, Peng Zhang, Siyuan Li

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lichun HanThe Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of the Ministry of Education, School of Life Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University Department of Anesthesia, Shaanxi Province Tumor Hospital Department of Anesthesia, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical College Department of anesthesia, the Second Affiliated hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yuqiang Su
Hongfei Xiong
Xiaoli Niu
Shajie Dang
Keqin Du
Quan Li
Jing Liu
Peng Zhang
Siyuan Li
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen Medical CollegeJilin Province Tumor Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA randomized controlled trial was performed to compare analgesic effects and adverse effects of oxycodone and sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) after abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.

methodsAdult patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomly allocated into oxycodone and sufentanil groups according to the randomization sequence. Study personnel, health-care team members, and patients were masked to the group assignment throughout the study period. Oxycodone (0.1 mg/kg for endoscopy; 0.15 mg/kg for laparotomy) or sufentanil (0.1 μg/kg for endoscopy; 0.15 μg/kg for laparotomy) was administrated at the end of surgeries. Postoperative pain was controlled using PCIA. Bolus dose was 2 mg and 2 μg for oxycodone and sufentanil group, respectively. The lockout time was 5 minutes for all patients, and there was no background infusion for oxycodone group, whereas 0.02 μg/kg/h background infusion was administrated in sufentanil group. The primary outcomes were the total analgesic doses in PCIA, effective bolus times, the length of first bolus since patients returning to ward from postanesthesia care unit (PACU), rescue analgesic rate in PACU, numeric rating scales, functional activity scores, and patients' satisfaction scores.

resultsA total of 200 patients were screened, and 175 patients were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to oxycodone (n = 87) and sufentanil (n = 88) groups. Both oxycodone and sufentanil PCIA provided adequate postoperative pain relief. Patients in oxycodone group showed a shorter consciousness recovery time after surgery. The major adverse effect in patients from oxycodone group was nausea/vomiting, whereas multiple adverse complications including nausea/vomiting, pruritus, and respiratory depression were observed in patients from sufentanil group. Patients from oxycodone group showed significantly reduced analgesic drug consumption (calculated as equivalent dose of morphine), functional activity scores, and patient satisfaction scores. DISCUSSION: Compared with sufentanil PCIA, oxycodone PCIA showed better analgesic effects, lower incidence of adverse complications, and less analgesic drug consumption during postoperative pain management.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthesia Recovery PeriodDouble-Blind MethodEndoscopyFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOxycodonePostoperative PainProspective StudiesSufentanilAnalgesics, OpioidOxycodoneSufentanil

Identifiers

PMID30075523
PMCPMC6081156
OpenAlexW2886790768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.