ArticleMedicine2018
Failure of ulipristal acetate treatment as an indication for uterine malignancy: Two case reports.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo study the clinical, pathological and therapeutic implications of ulipristal acetate (UPA) treatment failure in patients affected by uterine smooth muscle tumors. CASE PRESENTATION: Two patients affected by uterine leiomyosarcoma were preoperatively diagnosed as uterine leiomyomas and, thus, treated conservatively with UPA and morcellation. Both patients experienced a worsening of symptoms (persistent bleeding) after 3 month of treatment with UPA. Therefore a myomectomy with morcellation of tumor specimens was performed. Pathological examination of morcellated specimens revealed the unsuspected diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma based on the presence of severe nuclear atypia, tumor necrosis and increased mitotic activity. Unfortunately after 6 month of follow-up, 1 patient died for multiple peritoneal recurrences and lung metastases. The other patient is still alive after 3 month of follow-up and shows no local recurrences or metastases.
conclusionOur reported cases emphasize that the poor or absent response to UPA treatment in addition to the instrumental evidence of a single mass may be indicative of the presence of an unsuspected leiomyosarcoma clinically and radiologically misdiagnosed as leiomyoma. The awareness of this possibility would avoid a delay in the diagnosis as well as unuseful and potentially dangerous treatments such as morcellation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.