Observational studyMedicine2018
Peripartum women with dyspnea in the emergency department: Is it peripartum cardiomyopathy?
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Care of the Postpartum Patient in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review with Implications for Maternal Mortality.American journal of perinatology · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of prolactin and iron deficiency in peripartum cardiomyopathy.Open heart · 2020Pooled it
- BNP-Derived Uric Acid Composite Indices for the Evaluation of Dyspnea in Third-Trimester Pregnancy: A Prospective Emergency Department Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- The association of heart rate with adverse outcomes and recurrent heart failure hospitalization in peripartum cardiomyopathy.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025Article
- Review
- Cardiovascular Outcomes in Advanced Maternal Age Delivering Women. Clinical Review and Medico-Legal Issues.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is life-threatening and its diagnosis is a challenge. We highlight the clinical characteristics and bio-markers of PPCM and the proper differential diagnosis of peripartum dyspnea to aim to make an early diagnosis available.We analyzed 262 peripartum patients with dyspnea, and summed up the final diagnosis. The clinical data of the control group and the PPCM group as well as before and after the treatment of the PPCM group were compared.In total, 147 (56%) of the perinatal patients were physiologic dyspnea of pregnancy; only 11 (4%) patients met the PPCM diagnostic criteria. Compared with the basic baseline characteristics between the PPCM group and control group, patients with PPCM had a higher heart rate, and the white blood cell, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were markedly elevated, whereas PaO2 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were lower. The heart rate, CRP and BNP levels were lower at the follow-up compared with the pretreatment. Patients who were followed up showed significant improvements in the LVEF and New York Heart Association function class.We standardized the symptoms of dyspnea for calculating, and analyzed the diagnostic efficacy of laboratory indicators. The research highlighted that the use of echocardiography and disease-specific bio-markers may aid in the diagnosis and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.