Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075301›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2018

A Markov approach for increasing precision in the assessment of data-intensive behavioral interventions.

Vincent Berardi, Ricardo Carretero-González, John Bellettiere, Marc A Adams, Suzanne Hughes, Melbourne Hovell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent BerardiDepartment of Psychology, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA. Electronic address: berardi@chapman.edu.
Ricardo Carretero-GonzálezDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: rcarretero@sdsu.edu.
John BellettiereCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. Electronic address: jbellettiere@ucsd.edu.
Marc A AdamsCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA. Electronic address: marc.adams@asu.edu.
Suzanne HughesCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: shughes@cbeachsdsu.org.
Melbourne HovellCenter for Behavioral Epidemiology and Community Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: mhovell@cbeachsdsu.org.
San Diego State University · USArizona State University · USChapman University · US

Funding

UCSD Integrated Cardiovascular Epidemiology FellowshipT32HL079891 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Matthew A Allison · 2007 to 2026
$6.7M
Innovation for Smoke-Free Homes: Real-Time FeedbackR01HL103684 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HOVELL, MELBOURNE F · 2011 to 2015
$5.4M
UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteTL1TR001443 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DEPP, COLIN A. · 2015 to 2019
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001443NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL103684NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL079891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health interventions using real-time sensing technology are characterized by intensive longitudinal data, which has the potential to enable nuanced evaluations of individuals' responses to treatment. Existing analytic tools were not developed to capitalize on this opportunity as they typically focus on first-order findings such as changes in the level and/or slope of outcome variables over different intervention phases. This paper introduces an exploratory, Markov-based empirical transition method that offers a more comprehensive assessment of behavioral responses when intensive longitudinal data are available. The procedure projects a univariate time-series into discrete states and empirically determines the probability of transitioning from one state to another. State transition probabilities are summarized separately in phase-specific transition matrices. Comparing transition matrices illuminates intricate, quantifiable differences in behavior between intervention phases. Statistical significance is estimated via bootstrapping techniques. This paper introduces the methodology via three case studies from a secondhand smoke reduction trial utilizing real-time air particle sensors. Analysis enabled the identification of complex phenomena such as avoidance and escape behavior in response to punitive contingencies for tobacco use. Additionally, the largest changes in behavior dynamics were associated with the introduction of behavioral feedback. The Markov approach's ability to elucidate subtle behavioral details has not typically been feasible with standard methodologies, mainly due to historical limitations associated with infrequent repeated measures. These results suggest that the evaluation of intervention effects in data-intensive single-case designs can be enhanced, providing rich information that can ultimately be used to develop interventions uniquely tailored to specific individuals.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorBehavior TherapyClinical Trials as TopicComputational BiologyComputer SystemsFeedback, PsychologicalHumansLongitudinal StudiesMarkov ChainsRemote Sensing TechnologySoftwareTobacco Smoke PollutionTobacco Smoke PollutionBehavioral interventionse-HealthLongitudinal dataMarkov analysisMobile healthSecondhand smoke

Identifiers

PMID30075301
PMCPMC6697417
OpenAlexW2887253007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.