Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075027›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Combination of a six microRNA expression profile with four clinicopathological factors for response prediction of systemic treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Maarten Neerincx, Dennis Poel, Daoud L S Sie, Nicole C T van Grieken, Ram C Shankaraiah, Floor S W van der Wolf-de Lijster, Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe, Jan-Dirk Burggraaf, Paul P Eijk, Cornelis Verhoef and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fast Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Penalties for Group-Adaptive Elastic Net.Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. miRNAs-Based Molecular Signature forJournal of immunology research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maarten NeerincxDepartment of Medical Oncology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dennis PoelDepartment of Medical Oncology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daoud L S SieDepartment of Pathology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicole C T van GriekenDepartment of Pathology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ram C ShankaraiahDepartment of Medical Oncology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floor S W van der Wolf-de LijsterDepartment of Radiology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan-Hein T M van WaesbergheDepartment of Radiology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan-Dirk BurggraafDepartment of Pathology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
Paul P EijkDepartment of Pathology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Bauke YlstraDepartment of Pathology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerrit A MeijerDepartment of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark A van de WielDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tineke E BuffartDepartment of Medical Oncology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk M W VerheulDepartment of Medical Oncology, VUmc Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5981-922X
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLSpaarne Ziekenhuis · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFirst line chemotherapy is effective in 75 to 80% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We studied whether microRNA (miR) expression profiles can predict treatment outcome for first line fluoropyrimidine containing systemic therapy in patients with mCRC.

methodsMiR expression levels were determined by next generation sequencing from snap frozen tumor samples of 88 patients with mCRC. Predictive miRs were selected with penalized logistic regression and posterior forward selection. The prediction co-efficients of the miRs were re-estimated and validated by real-time quantitative PCR in an independent cohort of 81 patients with mCRC.

resultsExpression levels of miR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p, miR-30a-5p, miR-92a-3p, miR-92b-3p and miR-98-5p in combination with age, tumor differentiation, adjuvant therapy and type of systemic treatment, were predictive for clinical benefit in the training cohort with an AUC of 0.78. In the validation cohort the addition of the six miR signature to the four clinicopathological factors demonstrated a significant increased AUC for predicting treatment response versus those with stable disease (SD) from 0.79 to 0.90. The increase for predicting treatment response versus progressive disease (PD) and for patients with SD versus those with PD was not significant. in the validation cohort. MiR-17-5p, miR-20a-5p and miR-92a-3p were significantly upregulated in patients with treatment response in both the training and validation cohorts.

conclusionA six miR expression signature was identified that predicted treatment response to fluoropyrimidine containing first line systemic treatment in patients with mCRC when combined with four clinicopathological factors. Independent validation demonstrated added predictive value of this miR-signature for predicting treatment response versus SD. However, added predicted value for separating patients with PD could not be validated. The clinical relevance of the identified miRs for predicting treatment response has to be further explored.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMicroRNAsMiddle AgedPrognosisAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID30075027
PMCPMC6075783
OpenAlexW2885265774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.