Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30075020›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Neural responses when learning spatial and object sequencing tasks via imitation.

Elizabeth Renner, Jessica P White, Antonia F de C Hamilton, Francys Subiaul

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. LearningPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth RennerCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3363-4347
Jessica P WhiteDepartment of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Antonia F de C HamiltonDepartment of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Francys SubiaulCenter for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States of America.

Funding

European Research Council 648841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans often learn new things via imitation. Here we draw on studies of imitation in children to characterise the brain system(s) involved in the imitation of different sequence types using functional magnetic resonance imaging. On each trial, healthy adult participants learned one of two rule types governing the sequencing of three pictures: a motor-spatial rule (in the spatial task) or an object-based rule (in the cognitive task). Sequences were learned via one of three demonstration types: a video of a hand selecting items in the sequence using a joystick (Hand condition), a computer display highlighting each item in order (Ghost condition), or a text-based demonstration of the sequence (Text condition). Participants then used a joystick to execute the learned sequence. Patterns of activation during demonstration observation suggest specialisation for object-based imitation in inferior frontal gyrus, specialisation for spatial sequences in anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS), and a general preference for imitation in middle IPS. Adult behavioural performance contrasted with that of children in previous studies-indicating that they experienced more difficulty with the cognitive task-while neuroimaging results support the engagement of different neural regions when solving these tasks. Further study is needed on whether children's differential performance is related to delayed IPS maturation.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingChildFemaleHumansImitative BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingParietal LobePrefrontal CortexSpatial Learning

Identifiers

PMID30075020
PMCPMC6075756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.