ArticleAnesthesiology2018
Supervised Machine-learning Predictive Analytics for Prediction of Postinduction Hypotension.
Article in Anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preoperative patient risk factors for intraoperative hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive ability of hypotension prediction index and machine learning methods in intraoperative hypotension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and its clinical application in Anesthesiology: a systematic review.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2024Pooled it
- Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools.Anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Process optimisation: spinal versus general anaesthesia for endourological surgery. A randomised, controlled trial and machine-learning approach.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2024Trial
- Comparison of different ratios of propofol-ketamine admixture in rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia for emergency laparotomy: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Trial
- Hierarchical Poincaré analysis for anaesthesia monitoring.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Trial
- Comparative epidemiology of intraoperative hypotension and hypoxemia across three large retrospective cohorts.Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Perioperative Risk Prediction in Anesthesiology: A Bibliometric and Knowledge-Mapping Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- From prediction to practice: closing the translation gap in artificial intelligence for anesthesia.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Integrating multidimensional nociceptive-related cortical features for unsupervised assessment of anesthesia states in rats.iScience · 2026Article
- Early prediction of intraoperative hypotension: development and validation of the HypoBridCast hybrid deep learning model.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Article
- An Emerging Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroanesthesia.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Predictive value of ventriculo-arterial coupling for hypotension after induction of anaesthesia: a prospective observational cohort study.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Predicting Post-Induction Hypotension in Diverse Surgical Populations: A Multiclass Classification Universal Model Using Machine Learning Techniques.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Predicting propofol requirements in advanced gastrointestinal endoscopy: a validated model incorporating age and comorbidity index.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Approach to Predict Postoperative Pain and Opioid Usage in Elective Primary Spine Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Neurovascular Coupling: Scientometric Analysis of 30 Years Research (1996-2025).Brain and behavior · 2025Article
- Developing a machine learning-based prediction model for postinduction hypotension.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
what we already know about this topicWHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW:
background: Hypotension is a risk factor for adverse perioperative outcomes. Machine-learning methods allow large amounts of data for development of robust predictive analytics. The authors hypothesized that machine-learning methods can provide prediction for the risk of postinduction hypotension.
methodsData was extracted from the electronic health record of a single quaternary care center from November 2015 to May 2016 for patients over age 12 that underwent general anesthesia, without procedure exclusions. Multiple supervised machine-learning classification techniques were attempted, with postinduction hypotension (mean arterial pressure less than 55 mmHg within 10 min of induction by any measurement) as primary outcome, and preoperative medications, medical comorbidities, induction medications, and intraoperative vital signs as features. Discrimination was assessed using cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The best performing model was tuned and final performance assessed using split-set validation.
resultsOut of 13,323 cases, 1,185 (8.9%) experienced postinduction hypotension. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using logistic regression was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.72), support vector machines was 0.63 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.60), naive Bayes was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.69), k-nearest neighbor was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.65), linear discriminant analysis was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.73), random forest was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.75), neural nets 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.71), and gradient boosting machine 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.77). Test set area for the gradient boosting machine was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.77).
conclusionsThe success of this technique in predicting postinduction hypotension demonstrates feasibility of machine-learning models for predictive analytics in the field of anesthesiology, with performance dependent on model selection and appropriate tuning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30074930What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.