Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30074876›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurotrauma2018

A Nonliquid Crystal Display Screen Computer for Treatment of Photosensitivity and Computer Screen Intolerance in Post-Concussion Syndrome.

Ann Mansur, Tyler M Hauer, Mohammed Wasif Hussain, Mohammed K Alatwi, Apameh Tarazi, Mozhgan Khodadadi, Charles H Tator

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurotrauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Systematic Review of Telehealth and Sport-Related Concussion: Baseline Testing, Diagnosis, and Management.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ann Mansur1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Tyler M Hauer1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Mohammed Wasif Hussain1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Mohammed K Alatwi1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Apameh Tarazi1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Mozhgan Khodadadi2 Canadian Concussion Centre , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
Charles H Tator1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada .
University of Toronto · CAToronto Western Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid crystal display (LCD) screens refresh at a rate of 60 times per second, which can be perceived by concussed individuals who have photosensitivity, leading to computer intolerance. A non-LCD computer screen that refreshes at a much lower rate could relieve this photosensitivity and computer screen intolerance in patients with post-concussion syndrome (PCS). Twenty-nine patients with PCS, computer intolerance, and photosensitivity performed a reading task for a maximum of 30 min, with an LCD computer or a non-LCD device, and were given a comprehension test after completion of the reading task. The Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 was administered before and after each reading task. Symptom scores, amount of time spent reading, and performance on the comprehension tests were compared between the two devices. Patients also completed a self-report questionnaire of their subjective experience. The LCD screen computer produced significantly greater symptom exacerbation (median difference = 5, W = 315, p < 0.01) and a greater number of symptoms (median difference = 1, W = 148, p < 0.01) than the non-LCD screens. The non-LCD screen resulted in a longer symptom-free reading time (median = 48 sec, W = 147, p < 0.01), but not a greater number of words read (median = 281, W = 148, p = 0.098). Females were more likely to have greater symptom exacerbation with the LCD screen (U = 14.0, p < 0.01). No significant difference was found in performance on the comprehension test. Subjective reports showed that the non-LCD experience was more favorable, and most patients stated they would recommend this device for other patients with PCS. This study is the first to show the clinical utility of non-LCD screen computers in the management of photosensitivity and computer screen intolerance in patients with PCS. The non-LCD screen computer has the potential to facilitate return-to-work or return-to-school in concussed individuals.

Indexed as

ComputersData DisplayPost-Concussion SyndromeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedcomputer screen intolerancephotosensitivitypost-concussion syndrometraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID30074876
PMCPMC6079648
OpenAlexW2887715579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.