Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30074198›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2018

Outpatient Experience of Human Caring Scale (OEHC-Scale): Improvement by Delphi Method.

Chun-Yan Guan, Yi-Lan Liu, Hui Huang, Xia Yang, Juan-Juan Xu, Xin-Qiao Fu, De-Ying Hu, Cai-Hong Lu, Zhi-Guo Zhang, Juan Xu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chun-Yan GuanUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Yi-Lan LiuUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China. yilanl2008@sina.com.
Hui HuangUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Xia YangUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Juan-Juan XuUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Xin-Qiao FuUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
De-Ying HuUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Cai-Hong LuUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Zhi-Guo ZhangSchool of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Juan XuUnion Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, China.
Peng HanIntegrated Manager Office, West of China-Japanese Friendship Hospital, Beijing, 100085, China.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNUnion Hospital · CNChina-Japan Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on the outpatient interview and literature review, the initial framework of the outpatient experience of human caring scale was formed with 9 dimensions of outpatient process. The research aim was to improve the scale by Delphi method. Sixteen experts in medical management, human caring or medical education were invited to evaluate the importance of the dimensions and items of the scale and provided some expertise via filling out the Delphi consultation questionnaires twice in the consulting round. In the first round, the recovery rate showing the experts' positivity was 80%; the coefficient of reliability (Cr) ascertaining the authority of the evaluation was 0.92; the mean and full mark ratios responding the concentration of the evaluation were 2.88-4.94 and 6.25%-93.75% respectively; the coefficients of variation (CV) and the Kendall's W determining the concordance of the evaluation were 5.06%-52.15% and 0.21-0.24 respectively. In the second round, the recovery rate was 93.75%; the Cr was 0.93; the mean was 3.93-4.93; the full mark ratios were 26.67%-93.33%; the Kendall's W was 0.14-0.31, the CV was 5.25%-23.61%. Via the two-round Delphi study, the scale that included 10 dimensions and 61 items has been improved. Ten dimensions are pre-hospital medical service, guidance, registration, waiting, diagnosis & treatment, paying, inspection & assay, medicine receiving, therapy/injection/transfusion and global evaluation. It was concluded that Chinese scholars have paid high attention to human caring and outpatient experience. The experts have given high agreements about the dimensions which were established with Chinese outpatient process. The dimensions are different from the similar researches about outpatient experience study. In the future, it is necessary to survey the outpatients to test the construct validity, internal consistency reliability and others of the scale to improve the scale.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueOutpatientsPatient CareClinical CompetenceHumansSurveys and Questionnairesconsensus methodsDelphi methodhuman caringneeds assessmentoutpatient experiencequality measurement

Identifiers

PMID30074198
OpenAlexW2801795469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.