Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30074196›Full record

SynthesisCurrent medical science2018

BIS Monitoring on Intraoperative Awareness: A Meta-analysis.

Wen-Wei Gao, Yu-Hong He, Lian Liu, Quan Yuan, Ya-Feng Wang, Bo Zhao

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Children need sustainability].Die Anaesthesiologie · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. [Inhalational anesthetics].Der Anaesthesist · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wen-Wei GaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Yu-Hong HeOffice of Infection Control, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Lian LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Quan YuanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Ya-Feng WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China.
Bo ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China. zb14526@163.com.
Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative awareness is a very serious complication of general anesthesia. Several studies have evaluated the potential association between bispectral index (BIS) and intraoperative awareness, however, the results obtained were controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to further assess the association between the BIS monitoring and the incidence of intraoperative awareness. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify all eligible studies from the online literature databases published prior to Feb. 2017. A total of five studies with 17 432 cases and 16 749 controls were included. An odds ratio (OR) and a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to examine the strength of the association. The results showed that in the overall analysis, the association between the BIS monitoring and the incidence of intraoperative awareness was not significant (OR=0.58, 95% CI= 0.22-1.58, P=0.29). A stratified analysis by comparing different anesthesia methods revealed that BIS monitoring group showed a lower incidence of intraoperative awareness in patients with intravenous anesthesia when compared with non-BIS monitoring group (OR=0.20, 95% CI=0.08-0.49, P=0.0004), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of intraoperative awareness between BIS and non-BIS monitoring groups in patients with inhalation anesthesia (OR=1.13, 95% CI=0.56-2.26, P=0.73). In conclusion, our meta-analysis showed that BIS monitoring had no appreciable advantage in the reduction of the intraoperative awareness incidence in inhalation anesthesia, while showed a remarkable superiority in intravenous anesthesia.

Indexed as

Consciousness MonitorsAnesthesia, InhalationAnesthesia, IntravenousHumansIntraoperative Awarenessbispectral indexgeneral anesthesiaintraoperative awarenessmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID30074196
OpenAlexW2802998234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.