Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30074163›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2018

Clinical Assessment of Differential Diagnostic Methods in Infants with Cholestasis due to Biliary Atresia or Non-Biliary Atresia.

Chen Dong, Hui-Yun Zhu, Yun-Chao Chen, Xiao-Ping Luo, Zhi-Hua Huang

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. [Analysis of the etiology and clinical indicators of infantile cholestasis].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chen DongDepartment of Pediatrics, Wuhan, 430030, China. dongchen98@163.com.
Hui-Yun ZhuDepartment of Pediatrics, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Yun-Chao ChenDepartment of Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Xiao-Ping LuoDepartment of Pediatrics, Wuhan, 430030, China. Xpluo@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Zhi-Hua HuangDepartment of Pediatrics, Wuhan, 430030, China. Zhhuang@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn.
Tongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The different methods in differentiating biliary atresia (BA) from non-BA-related cholestasis were evaluated in order to provide a practical basis for a rapid, early and accurate differential diagnosis of the diseases. 396 infants with cholestatic jaundice were studied prospectively during the period of May 2007 to June 2011. The liver function in all subjects was tested. All cases underwent abdominal ultrasonography and duodenal fluid examination. Most cases were subjected to hepatobiliary scintigraphy, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and a percutaneous liver biopsy. The diagnosis of BA was finally made by cholangiography or histopathologic examination. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of these various methods were compared. 178 patients (108 males and 70 females with a mean age of 58±30 days) were diagnosed as having BA. 218 patients (136 males and 82 females with a mean age of 61 ±24 days) were diagnosed as having non-BA etiologies of cholestasis jaundice during the follow-up period in which jaundice faded after treatment with medical therapy. For diagnosis of BA, clinical evaluation, hepatomegaly, stool color, serum gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), duodenal juice color, bile acid in duodenal juice, ultrasonography (gallbladder), ultrasonography (griangular cord or strip-apparent hyperechoic foci), hepatobiliary scintigraphy, MRCP, liver biopsy had an accuracy of 76.0%, 51.8%, 84.3%, 70.0%, 92.4%, 98.0%, 90.4%, 67.2%, 85.3%, 83.2% and 96.6%, a sensitivity of 83.1%, 87.6%, 96.1%, 73.7%, 90.4%, 100%, 92.7%, 27.5%, 100%, 89.0% and 97.4%, a specificity of 70.2%, 77.5%, 74.8%, 67.0%, 94.0%, 96.3%, 88.5%, 99.5%, 73.3%, 75.4% and 94.3%, a positive predictive value of 69.0%, 72.6%, 75.7%, 64.6%, 92.5%, 95.7%, 86.8%, 98.0%, 75.4%, 82.6% and 98.0%, and a negative predictive value of 83.6%, 8.5%, 95.9%, 75.7%, 92.3%, 100%, 84.2%, 93.7%, 100%, 84.0% and 92.6%, respectively. It was concluded that all the differential diagnosis methods are useful. The test for duodenal drainage and elements is fast and accurate. It is helpful in the differential diagnosis of BA and non-BA etiologies of cholestasis. It shows good practical value clinically.

Indexed as

Bile Acids and SaltsBiliary AtresiaBiomarkersCholangiographyCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceCholestasisDiagnosis, DifferentialFecesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornJaundice, NeonatalLiverMaleSensitivity and SpecificityBile Acids and SaltsBiomarkersbiliary atresiajaundiceneonatal cholestasisnon-biliary atresia etiologies of cholestasis

Identifiers

PMID30074163
OpenAlexW2794375034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.