Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30074069›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2018

Current trends among pediatric ophthalmologists to decrease myopia progression-an international perspective.

Ofira Zloto, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe, Sonal K Farzavandi, Rosario Gomez-de-Liaño, Derek T Sprunger, Eedy Mezer

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Incidence and Risk Factors of Refractive Error in Children in Spain: CISViT Project.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How Have Animal Models Increased our Understanding of Human Myopia?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  9. Does 0.01% atropine have a place as a myopia control therapy?Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The impact of the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic on childhood myopia control practice patterns among ophthalmologists-an international pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus council global perspective.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. The impact of spectacle lenses for myopia control on visual functions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ofira ZlotoGoldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Tamara Wygnanski-JaffeGoldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Sonal K FarzavandiSingapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Rosario Gomez-de-LiañoHospital Clínico/Instituto Castroviejo-Universidad Complutense Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Derek T SprungerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pediatric and Strabismus Section, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Eedy MezerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ruth Rappaport Children's Hospital, Rambam Health Care campus, POB 9907, 3109901, Haifa, Israel. emezer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2818-7538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore what the current worldwide preferred practice patterns of pediatric ophthalmologists are to decrease myopia progression among their patients.

methodsA questionnaire was sent to all members of supranational and national pediatric ophthalmology and strabismus societies.

resultsThe questionnaire was fully completed by most respondents 90.10% (847 of 940 responses). Fifty-seven percent (457) routinely treat to decrease myopia progression. The most common parameter to initiate treatment was a myopic increase of 1 diopter/year or more (74.8%, 246). Seventy percent (345) prescribed eye drops. Atropine 0.01% was the most popular (63.4%, 277) followed by atropine 1% (10.9%, 48) and atropine 0.5% (8.9%, 39). Eighty-six percent (394) of the respondents advised to spend more time outdoors, to reduce the amount of time viewing screens (60.2%, 277), and cutback the use of smart phones (63.9%, 294).

conclusionsMost pediatric ophthalmologists treat to decrease myopia. They employ a wide variety of means to decrease myopia progression. Atropine 0.01% is the most popular and safe modality used similarly to recent reports. However, there is no consensus when treatment should be initiated. Further prospective studies are needed to elucidate the best timing to start treatment and the applicability of recent studies in the Asian population to other ethnic groups. This will improve the ability to update pediatric ophthalmologist with evidenced-based treatment options to counter the myopia epidemic.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceSocieties, MedicalAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIncidenceIsraelMaleMyopiaOphthalmologistsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAtropineBehavioral treatmentIPOSCMyopiaOptical treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.