Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073883›Full record

ReviewJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2018

Sensory stimulation in acute stroke therapy.

Daniel von Bornstädt, Karen Gertz, Nielsen Lagumersindez Denis, Pierre Seners, Jean-Claude Baron, Matthias Endres

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel von Bornstädt1 Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Karen Gertz1 Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nielsen Lagumersindez Denis1 Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Pierre Seners4 Department of Neurology, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, University Paris Descartes, INSERM U894, France.
Jean-Claude Baron4 Department of Neurology, Hôpital Sainte-Anne, University Paris Descartes, INSERM U894, France.
Matthias Endres1 Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The beneficial effects of cortical activation for functional recovery after ischemic stroke have been well described. However, little is known about the role of early sensory stimulation, i.e. stimulation during first 6 h after stroke onset even during acute treatment. In recent years, various preclinical studies reported significant effects of acute sensory stimulation that range from entire neuroprotection to increased infarct volumes by 30-50%. Systematic knowledge about the effect of acute sensory stimulation on stroke outcome is highly relevant as stroke patients are subject to uncontrolled sensory stimulation during transport, acute treatment, and critical care. This article discusses the current stage of knowledge about acute sensory stimulation and provides directions for future experimental and clinical trials.

Indexed as

Physical StimulationAnimalsHumansNeurovascular CouplingRecovery of FunctionStrokeCollateral reperfusioncortical activationischemic strokesensory stimulationstroke models

Identifiers

PMID30073883
PMCPMC6168904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.