Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073669›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2019

Instrumental variable estimation in semi-parametric additive hazards models.

Matthias Brueckner, Andrew Titman, Thomas Jaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthias BruecknerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6103-9895
Andrew TitmanDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, U.K.
Thomas JakiDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YF, U.K.

Funding

Department of Health SRF-2015-08-001Medical Research Council MR/M005755/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Instrumental variable methods allow unbiased estimation in the presence of unmeasured confounders when an appropriate instrumental variable is available. Two-stage least-squares and residual inclusion methods have recently been adapted to additive hazard models for censored survival data. The semi-parametric additive hazard model which can include time-independent and time-dependent covariate effects is particularly suited for the two-stage residual inclusion method, since it allows direct estimation of time-independent covariate effects without restricting the effect of the residual on the hazard. In this article, we prove asymptotic normality of two-stage residual inclusion estimators of regression coefficients in a semi-parametric additive hazard model with time-independent and time-dependent covariate effects. We consider the cases of continuous and binary exposure. Estimation of the conditional survival function given observed covariates is discussed and a resampling scheme is proposed to obtain simultaneous confidence bands. The new methods are compared to existing ones in a simulation study and are applied to a real data set. The proposed methods perform favorably especially in cases with exposure-dependent censoring.

Indexed as

Least-Squares AnalysisModels, StatisticalProportional Hazards ModelsComputer SimulationConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicHumansInsuranceRegression AnalysisTime FactorsUnemploymentAdditive hazardConfoundingInstrumental variableSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID30073669
PMCPMC7379316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.