Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073626›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2019

Retrospective multicenter study of post-operative stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis.

Alberto Sartori, Maurizio De Luca, Valentino Fiscon, Mauro Frego, CANSAS study working group, Giuseppe Portale

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Surgery-induced and Associated Long-term Strictures.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto SartoriDepartment of General Surgery, ULSS 2, Montebelluna, Italy.
Maurizio De LucaDepartment of General Surgery, ULSS 2, Montebelluna, Italy.
Valentino FisconDepartment of General Surgery, Azienda ULSS 6, Cittadella, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40 35013, Cittadella, Padova, Italy.
Mauro FregoDepartment of General Surgery, ULSS 6, Schiavonia, Italy.
CANSAS study working group
Giuseppe PortaleDepartment of General Surgery, Azienda ULSS 6, Cittadella, Via Casa di Ricovero, 40 35013, Cittadella, Padova, Italy. portale@surgery.usc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-0464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic stenosis after colorectal surgery is usually considered low-rate complication and often is under-reported in most studies. Few data are available on management strategies. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis, performed either in elective or emergent setting, for benign or malignant disease, and to evaluate treatment profiles. This retrospective study was a survey conducted in a large Italian North-Eastern area including three regions (Triveneto), over a 12-month period (January-December 2015). Patients' characteristics and surgical technique details were recorded, along with data on the prevalence of stenosis and its treatment. Patients with mid or low rectal resection and/or neoadjuvant chemo-radio therapy and/or diverting stoma were excluded. The study was promoted by the Italian Association of Hospital Surgeons (ACOI) and the Society of Surgeons of the Triveneto Region. Twenty-eight surgical units were enrolled in the survey, accounting for over 1400 patients studied. Fifty percent of the units performed laparoscopically > 70% of the colorectal resections and 7.5% of the procedures were emergent. Less than 60% of the units planned regular endoscopic follow-up after colorectal resection. Anastomotic stricture was recorded in 2% of the patients; 88% of the stenoses were diagnosed within 6 months from surgery. Only one anastomotic stricture required re-do surgery. The CANSAS study confirms that colorectal anastomotic stenosis is low-rate-but still present-complication. Treatment strategies vary according to surgeons' and endoscopists' preferences. Commonly endoscopic dilatation is preferred, but re-do surgery is required in some cases.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalColorectal NeoplasmsConstriction, PathologicHumansItalyMalePostoperative ComplicationsPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSurgical StaplingColorectal anastomosisEndoscopic dilatationStapled anastomosisStenosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.