ArticleUpdates in surgery2019
Retrospective multicenter study of post-operative stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the effects of stent-based diversion technique versus prophylactic double-lumen ileostomy on intestinal flora in postoperative patients with rectal cancer.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Ileostoma as a promising tool in pathophysiological study and clinical intervention: a review from bench to beside.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Surgery-induced and Associated Long-term Strictures.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic redo surgery for sigmoid volvulus following laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.Surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Fibrosis signature of anastomotic margins for predicting anastomotic stenosis in rectal cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and sphincter-preserving surgery.Gastroenterology report · 2024Article
- Resolution of occult anastomotic stricture with anal dilator: challenges with the conventional diagnostic criteria in low anterior rectal resection patient-a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Snare-tipped endoscopic radical incision and cutting for postoperative colorectal anastomotic stricture.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- The impact of circular stapler size on the risk of anastomotic stricture following total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: A retrospective cross-sectional study.Health science reports · 2023Article
- A delayed benign anastomotic stricture after anterior resection for sigmoid adenocarcinoma with concomitant collagenous colitis.Journal of surgical case reports · 2023Article
- A nomogram to predict risk factors of frequent defecation early after ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Endoscopic radial incision and cutting technique for treatment-naive stricture of colorectal anastomosis: Two case reports.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020Article
- Treatment of a Total Obstructive Anastomosis Stricture Using a Transanal Laparoscopic Approach and Intraoperative Colonoscopic Balloon Dilatation.Annals of coloproctology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic stenosis after colorectal surgery is usually considered low-rate complication and often is under-reported in most studies. Few data are available on management strategies. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis, performed either in elective or emergent setting, for benign or malignant disease, and to evaluate treatment profiles. This retrospective study was a survey conducted in a large Italian North-Eastern area including three regions (Triveneto), over a 12-month period (January-December 2015). Patients' characteristics and surgical technique details were recorded, along with data on the prevalence of stenosis and its treatment. Patients with mid or low rectal resection and/or neoadjuvant chemo-radio therapy and/or diverting stoma were excluded. The study was promoted by the Italian Association of Hospital Surgeons (ACOI) and the Society of Surgeons of the Triveneto Region. Twenty-eight surgical units were enrolled in the survey, accounting for over 1400 patients studied. Fifty percent of the units performed laparoscopically > 70% of the colorectal resections and 7.5% of the procedures were emergent. Less than 60% of the units planned regular endoscopic follow-up after colorectal resection. Anastomotic stricture was recorded in 2% of the patients; 88% of the stenoses were diagnosed within 6 months from surgery. Only one anastomotic stricture required re-do surgery. The CANSAS study confirms that colorectal anastomotic stenosis is low-rate-but still present-complication. Treatment strategies vary according to surgeons' and endoscopists' preferences. Commonly endoscopic dilatation is preferred, but re-do surgery is required in some cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30073626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.