Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073623›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2018

Negative impact of dextran in organ culture media for pre-stripped tissue preservation on DMEK (Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) outcome.

Alaadin Abdin, Loay Daas, Max Pattmöller, Shady Suffo, Achim Langenbucher, Berthold Seitz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exploring interspecies differences inJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty DMEK - Donor and recipient step by step].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alaadin AbdinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Homburg/Saar, Germany. alaadin.abdin@uks.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8190-7277
Loay DaasDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Max PattmöllerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Shady SuffoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Achim LangenbucherInstitute of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center UKS, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the morphological and functional outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed with pre-stripped tissue preserved in organ culture medium containing dextran compared to tissue preserved in dextran-free medium.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed the clinical records of 103 patients who underwent DMEK surgery with pre-stripped tissue in our department between June 2015 and September 2016. The endothelium-Descemet membrane layer was preserved in organ culture medium for a maximum of 48 h for all patients. For group 1, 49 endothelium-Descemet membrane (EDM) were stripped and preserved in medium 1 (dextran-free organ culture medium), while 54 EDM were stripped and preserved in medium 2 (organ culture medium supplemented with 6% dextran T-500) for group 2. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell density (ECD) of all eyes in both groups at three consecutive postoperative time points: 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively. We also compared the repeat keratoplasty rates between the groups.

resultsGroup 1 showed a statistically significant better BCVA compared to group 2 at each time point (p < 0.05). The percentage of grafts achieving 0.5 or better after 6 months in group 1 was 96% and in group 2, it was 66% (P < 0.001). CCT was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2 at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery (p < 0.05). ECD was comparable between donor grafts before surgery but was significantly greater in groups 1 after 2 and 6 weeks (p < 0.05), but not after 6 months. Necessity for repeat keratoplasty (repeat DMEK, subsequent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP)) was significantly lower in group 1 (p < 0.05).

conclusionsPre-stripped tissue for DMEK preserved in dextran-free medium led to better visual recovery, thinner postoperative corneas, a higher endothelial cell density, and a lower rate of repeat keratoplasty, indicating that dextran has an unfavorable impact on the preservation of pre-stripped DMEK tissue.

Indexed as

Culture MediaDescemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyTissue PreservationAgedCell CountDextransEndothelium, CornealFemaleFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Culture TechniquesPlasma SubstitutesTissue DonorsCulture MediaDextransPlasma SubstitutesDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplastyDextranDMEKOrgan culture mediumPreservationPre-stripped tissue

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.