Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073616›Full record

ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2018

Discontinuation of renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury: predictive factors of renal function recovery.

Helmut Schiffl

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urology and nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Helmut SchifflDepartment of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany. h-schiffl@t-online.de.
München Klinik · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSevere acute kidney injury (AKI-D) is common in critically ill patients and contributes substantially to short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. Acute renal replacement therapy (RRT) is an increasingly widely utilized life-sustaining support strategy for AKI-D patients, providing a bridge to renal recovery in many survivors of AKI. However, key aspects (when and how) of this therapy's appropriate cessation remain unclear. Today, wide variation in clinical practice exists regarding the indication for and the timing of RTT discontinuation, likely due to the poor current evidence base.

methodsFew studies have evaluated the process of weaning or ideal markers (clinical factors or parameters that may suggest renal recovery, such as urine output, urine chemistry, and creatinine clearance) to predict sufficient recovery of renal function following AKI and to avoid re-institution of RRT. However, translation of the current evidence to clinical practice is hampered by considerable limitations of the retrospective, post hoc secondary design of cohort studies, small sample sizes, heterogeneity across study populations and illness severity, variations of the thresholds of predictive markers and conflicting results for given markers. Currently, 24-h creatinine clearance greater than 20 ml/min combined with spontaneously decreasing serum creatinine concentrations in the context of fixed RRT and a clinically stable intensive care unit (ICU) patient may be the best predictor of recovery of excretory renal function.

conclusionThe decision regarding the appropriate time to wean acute RRT is complex, integrating numerous clinical variables and renal functional parameters. Cessation of RRT should largely be individualized in critically ill patients. Large randomized multicentre trials are needed to definitively answer the vitally important question of whether inappropriate discontinuation of RRT in ICU patients with AKI-D impacts patient outcomes. Future work should integrate novel kidney damage and repair biomarkers and techniques to measure real-time glomerular filtration rates.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionWithholding TreatmentAcute Kidney InjuryClinical Decision-MakingCreatinineCritical IllnessHumansPredictive Value of TestsRenal Replacement TherapyUreaUrineCreatinineUreaAcute kidney injuryDiscontinuation of renal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID30073616
OpenAlexW2886612362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.