Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073611›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

PCNE definition of medication review: reaching agreement.

Nina Griese-Mammen, Kurt E Hersberger, Markus Messerli, Saija Leikola, Nejc Horvat, J W Foppe van Mil, Mitja Kos

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 155 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
155citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04417400 nacompletednot on this map

Benefits of Medicines Use Review Service in Slovenia: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMitja KosRan2017 to 2017Enrolled169ConditionsMedicines Use Review Service, Multiple Medication, Adherence, MedicationArmsmedicines use review
NCT05348538 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Feasibility Study of the Medication Review With Follow up Service for Patients With Polypharmacy in Swiss Community Pharmacies

TypeinterventionalSponsorCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisante), University of Lausanne, SwitzerlandRan2023 to 2024Enrolled162ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsMedication review with follow up or MaJ? for the acronym in french
NCT06997861 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Parallel Randomized Study to Determine Pain Intensity and Quality of Life in Patients With Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Receiving Medication Review With Follow-up VS Usual Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorPolytechnic Institute of PortoRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsChronic PainArmsMedication Review Type III, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

155 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nina Griese-MammenDepartment of Medicine, ABDA - Federal Union of German Associations of Pharmacists, Unter den Linden 19-23, 10117, Berlin, Germany. n.griese-mammen@abda.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8830-9031
Kurt E HersbergerPharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8678-697X
Markus MesserliPharmaceutical Care Research Group, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 50, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2612-3469
Saija LeikolaPharmac Finland Oy, Rajatorpantie 41, 01640, Vantaa, Finland.
Nejc HorvatFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8460-276X
J W Foppe van Milvan Mil Consultancy, Margrietlaan 1, 9471 CT, Zuidlaren, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7049-4064
Mitja KosFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Askerceva 7, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6801-6450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Medication review is important in an era, in which polypharmacy is increasing. To date, no agreed international definition of medication review exists. Objective The aim was to reach agreement on an internationally applicable definition of medication review. Setting An international group of experts in medication review. Methods A working group of the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE) was established to agree on a definition including a classification of medication review. First, a survey with the aim of systematically gathering viewpoints on a definition of medication review was conducted. Second, a workshop was held to achieve an agreement. Finally, during the General Assembly of PCNE, the definition was approved. To ensure a better understanding of the scope and the considerations behind the definition, a position paper was created. Main outcome measure An internationally agreed definition of medication review. Results 58 PCNE members from 20 different countries completed the online survey. Then, 22 participants from 11 different countries (not only PCNE members) elaborated the final definition during a workshop. The final PCNE version agreed was: "Medication review is a structured evaluation of a patient's medicines with the aim of optimising medicines use and improving health outcomes. This entails detecting drug-related problems and recommending interventions". Overall, the consensus process included 225 people from 35 countries and resulted also in a classification of medication review taking into account the type and source of available information. Conclusion Involvement of an international community from research and practice and the use of a systematic process led to an agreement on the term medication review and on a classification valid for all settings and professions.

Indexed as

Medication Therapy ManagementTerminology as TopicConsensusDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEuropeFemaleHumansMalePharmaceutical ServicesPolypharmacyClinical pharmacyDrug-related problemsMedication managementMedication reviewPharmaceutical carePharmacy practice

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.