Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073589›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2018

Trends to store digital data in DNA: an overview.

Fatima Akram, Ikram Ul Haq, Haider Ali, Aiman Tahir Laghari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advances in CRISPR/Cas9.BioMed research international · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatima AkramInstitute of Industrial Biotechnology, GC University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Ikram Ul HaqInstitute of Industrial Biotechnology, GC University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan. director_dric@gcu.edu.pk.
Haider AliInstitute of Industrial Biotechnology, GC University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Aiman Tahir LaghariInstitute of Industrial Biotechnology, GC University, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an ascending growth in the capacity of information being generated. The increased production of data in turn has put forward other challenges as well thus, and there is the need to store this information and not only to store it but also to retain it for a prolonged time period. The reliance on DNA as a dense storage medium with high storage capacity and its ability to withstand extreme environmental conditions has increased over the past few years. There have been developments in reading and writing different forms of data on DNA, codes for encrypting data and using DNA as a way of secret writing leading towards new styles like stenography and cryptography. The article outlines different methods adopted for storing digital data on DNA with pros and cons of each method that has been applied plus the advantages and limitations of using DNA as a storage medium.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBase SequenceComputers, MolecularDatabases, GeneticDNAInformation Storage and RetrievalDNAAlignmentCryptographyDigital dataOligonucleotidesSequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.