ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2019
Physiological Whole-Brain Distribution of [
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear Medicine Imaging Biomarkers in Parkinson's Disease: Past, Present, and Future Directions.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Modelling cholinergic and dopaminergic function over time in Parkinson's disease with and without GBA1 variants.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2025Article
- An automatic analysis framework for FDOPA PET neuroimaging.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023Article
- Functional dynamics of dopamine synthesis during monetary reward and punishment processing.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021Article
- The role of neuroimaging in Parkinson's disease.Journal of neurochemistry · 2021Review
- From metabolic connectivity to molecular connectivity: application to dopaminergic pathways.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose6-[ PROCEDURES: One hundred and seventy-seven subjects were retrospectively included. A whole-brain statistical parametric mapping analysis of the [
resultsStriatal uptake indices were influenced by age, negatively for the caudate nucleus and positively for the putamen, as well as by gender, with a lower left putaminal uptake index in women. Extra-striatal uptake indices were influenced by age, negatively for the frontal cortex and brainstem and positively for the occipital cortex and cerebellum, as well as by gender (diffuse increase in women).
conclusionsThe uptake index of [
Indexed as
Identifiers
30073569What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.