Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073468›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

The reliability of end of day and ecological momentary assessments of pain and pain interference in individuals with spinal cord injury.

Noelle E Carlozzi, Stephen Schilling, Jenna Freedman, Claire Z Kalpakjian, Anna L Kratz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Pressing Issues in Ecological Momentary Assessment.Annual review of clinical psychology · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noelle E CarlozziDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. carlozzi@med.umich.edu.
Stephen SchillingInstitute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jenna FreedmanDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Claire Z KalpakjianDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anna L KratzDepartment of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Characteristics and Mechanisms of Cognitive Problems in FibromyalgiaK01AR064275 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KRATZ, ANNA LOUISE · 2014 to 2018
$653k
Craig H. Neilsen Foundation 287372National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (US) K01AR064275NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR064275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study investigated the most efficient means of measuring pain intensity and pain interference comparing ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to end of day (EOD) data, with the highest level of measurement reliability as examined in individuals with spinal cord injury.

methodsEMA (five times throughout the day) and EOD ratings of pain and pain interference were collected over a 7-day period. Multilevel models were used to examine the reliability for both EOD and EMA assessments in order to determine the amount of variability in these assessments over the course of a week or the day, and a multilevel version of the Spearman-Brown Prophecy formula was used to estimate values for reliability.

resultsFindings indicate the minimum of number of EOD and EMA assessments needed to achieve different levels of reliability ("adequate" > 0.70, "good" > 0.80 and excellent > 0.90). In addition, the time of day (either morning, midday or evening) did not impact the estimated reliability for the EMA assessments.

conclusionsThese findings can help researchers and clinician balance the cost/benefit tradeoffs of these different types of assessments by providing specific cutoffs for the numbers of each type of assessment that are needed to achieve excellent reliability.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentPain MeasurementSelf ReportAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainParaplegiaQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Cord InjuriesSurveys and QuestionnairesDaily diariesEcological momentary assessmentFeasibilityPainPain interferenceSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID30073468
PMCPMC6196118
OpenAlexW2887136021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.