Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073386›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Online visual cues can compensate for deficits in cutaneous feedback from the dorsal ankle joint for the trailing limb but not the leading limb during obstacle crossing.

Erika E Howe, Adam J Toth, Leah R Bent

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika E HoweDepartment Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Adam J TothDepartment Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Leah R BentDepartment Human Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. lbent@uoguelph.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8951-8783
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 312007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise control of the ankle is required to safely clear the ground during walking. Skin input contributes to proprioception about the ankle joint, during both passive movements and level walking. How skin might contribute to proprioceptive control of the ankle during a more complex functional task such as obstacle avoidance is unknown. The purpose of this study was to investigate skin contribution from the dorsum of the ankle joint to safely cross an obstacle, and examine the interaction between vision and skin. It was hypothesized that the lead and trail limbs would be influenced primarily by visual information and skin cues, respectively. Eleven healthy adults crossed an obstacle with either (1) intact sensory input (control) (2) reduced skin input using a topical anesthetic (anesthesia), (3) reduced visual input of the lower half of the visual field (partial vision) or (4) simultaneous reduction of skin and vision (paired). Kinematic measures of phase-dependent changes during these conditions were examined while subjects crossed the obstacle with their anesthetised foot as either the leading or trailing limb. Interestingly, lead limb toe trajectory was significantly affected both by deficits in visual and skin input, although the joint angle strategies differed across these sensory conditions. Subjects increased lead hip flexion with partial vision but increased hip roll with skin anesthesia relative to control. In contrast, trail limb toe trajectory was affected only by visual sensory loss. Overall visual feedback and skin input from the ankle dorsum differentially affect lead and trail limb kinematics to successfully cross an obstacle. Interestingly, it appears vision is not entirely able to compensate for reduced skin input during obstacle crossing.

Indexed as

CuesSkin Physiological PhenomenaAdultAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaFeedback, SensoryFemaleGaitHumansMaleTouch PerceptionWalkingYoung AdultAnkleObstacle avoidanceProprioceptionSkin

Identifiers

PMID30073386
OpenAlexW2885074098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.