Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073249›Full record

Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2018

Treatment for Residual Rhotic Errors With High- and Low-Frequency Ultrasound Visual Feedback: A Single-Case Experimental Design.

Jonathan L Preston, Tara McAllister, Emily Phillips, Suzanne Boyce, Mark Tiede, Jackie S Kim, Douglas H Whalen

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03736213 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: Delineation of Sensorimotor Subtypes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2019 to 2022Enrolled7ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsVisual-acoustic biofeedback, Ultrasound biofeedback
NCT03737318 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Correcting Residual Errors With Spectral, Ultrasound, and Traditional Speech Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled108ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsBiofeedback-ultrasound, Biofeedback--visual-acoustic, Traditional articulation treatment
NCT06517225 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Visual-acoustic Intervention With Service Delivery In-person and Via Telepractice (VISIT) Non-Inferiority Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNew York UniversityRan2024 to 2028Enrolled76ConditionsSpeech Sound DisorderArmsVisual-acoustic biofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tutorial: Using Visual-Acoustic Biofeedback for Speech Sound Training.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jonathan L PrestonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Syracuse University, NY.
Tara McAllisterDepartment of Communicative Sciences & Disorders, New York University, New York.
Emily PhillipsHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT.
Suzanne BoyceHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT.
Mark TiedeHaskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT.
Jackie S KimDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Columbia University, New York, NY.
Douglas H WhalenProgram in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, City University of New York Graduate Center, New York.

Funding

Improving clinical speech remediation with ultrasound technologyR01DC013668 · NIDCD · CUNY GRADUATE SCH AND UNIV CTR · PI BOYCE, SUZANNE ELIZABETH, WHALEN, DOUGLAS H · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to explore how the frequency with which ultrasound visual feedback (UVF) is provided during speech therapy affects speech sound learning. Method: Twelve children with residual speech errors affecting /ɹ/ participated in a multiple-baseline across-subjects design with 2 treatment conditions. One condition featured 8 hr of high-frequency UVF (HF; feedback on 89% of trials), whereas the other included 8 hr of lower-frequency UVF (LF; 44% of trials). The order of treatment conditions was counterbalanced across participants. All participants were treated on vocalic /ɹ/. Progress was tracked by measuring generalization on /ɹ/ in untreated words. Results: After the 1st treatment phase, participants who received the HF condition outperformed those who received LF. At the end of the 2-phase treatment, within-participant comparisons showed variability across individual outcomes in both HF and LF conditions. However, a group level analysis of this small sample suggested that participants whose treatment order was HF-LF made larger gains than those whose treatment order was LF-HF. Conclusions: The order HF-LF may represent a preferred order for UVF in speech therapy. This is consistent with empirical work and theoretical arguments suggesting that visual feedback may be particularly beneficial in the early stages of acquiring new speech targets.

Indexed as

AdolescentBiofeedback, PsychologyChildFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansLearningMalePhoneticsResearch DesignSpeechSpeech Production MeasurementSpeech Sound DisorderSpeech TherapyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30073249
PMCPMC6198924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.