Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073212›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2018

Selection of computational environments for PSP processing on scientific gateways.

Edvard Martins de Oliveira, Júlio Cézar Estrella, Alexandre Cláudio Botazzo Delbem, Luiz Henrique Nunes, Henrique Yoshikazu Shishido, Stephan Reiff-Marganiec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edvard Martins de OliveiraUniversity of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Júlio Cézar EstrellaUniversity of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Alexandre Cláudio Botazzo DelbemUniversity of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Luiz Henrique NunesUniversity of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Henrique Yoshikazu ShishidoUniversity of São Paulo, São Carlos, Brazil.
Stephan Reiff-MarganiecUniversity of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Science Gateways have been widely accepted as an important tool in academic research, due to their flexibility, simple use and extension. However, such systems may yield performance traps that delay work progress and cause waste of resources or generation of poor scientific results. This paper addresses an investigation on some of the failures in a Galaxy system and analyses of their impacts. The use case is based on protein structure prediction experiments performed. A novel science gateway component is proposed towards the definition of the relation between general parameters and capacity of machines. The machine-learning strategies used appoint the best machine setup in a heterogeneous environment and the results show a complete overview of Galaxy, a diverse platform organization, and the workload behavior. A Support Vector Regression (SVR) model generated and based on a historic data-set provided an excellent learning module and proved a varied platform configuration is valuable as infrastructure in a science gateway. The results revealed the advantages of investing in local cluster infrastructures as a base for scientific experiments.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsComputer science

Identifiers

PMID30073212
PMCPMC6068289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.