Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073147›Full record

ReviewPhotoacoustics2018

Hand-held optoacoustic imaging: A review.

Mason W Schellenberg, Heather K Hunt

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Photoacoustics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Optoacoustic muscle imaging.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review of Deep Learning Approaches for Interleaved Photoacoustic and Ultrasound (PAUS) Imaging.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mason W SchellenbergDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Missouri, 1406 E Rollin St., Columbia 65211, MO, USA.
Heather K HuntDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Missouri, 1406 E Rollin St., Columbia 65211, MO, USA.
University of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optoacoustic imaging is a medical imaging modality that uses optical excitation and acoustic detection to generate images of tissue structures based up optical absorption within a tissue sample. This imaging modality has been widely explored as a tool for a number of clinical applications, including cancer diagnosis and wound healing tracking. Recently, the optoacoustic imaging community has published a number of reports of

Indexed as

Hand-heldMultispectralOptoacoustic tomographyPhotoacoustic microscopyRaster scanning

Identifiers

PMID30073147
PMCPMC6068331
OpenAlexW2844026345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.