Article3 Biotech2018
Genetic diversity and population structure among 133 elite genotypes of sugarcane (
Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic diversity and population structure of sugarcane introgressed hybrids by SSR markers.3 Biotech · 2023Article
- Identification of potential MTAs and candidate genes for juice quality- and yield-related traits in Saccharum clones: a genome-wide association and comparative genomic study.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2022Article
- Genetic diversity assessment ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Response of Sugarcane Rhizosphere Bacterial Community to Drought Stress.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A measure of genetic diversity of genotypes to be used as parents is imperative to use them prudently in crop improvement. In this study, genetic diversity and population structure of 133 sugarcane hybrid derivatives were quantified using 20 sequence-tagged microsatellite sites (STMS) primers. The number of alleles ranged from 9 to 27 with the average of 17.95 alleles per primer, while the polymorphism information content values of the primers ranged from 0.29 to 0.78. Cophenetic correlation coefficient value observed as 0.84 by STMS markers revealed that the cluster result was acceptable for the calculation of genetic similarity matrix. Principal component analysis showed that 133 genotypes fell in two groups, first and second components associated 8.34 and 3.22% with eigen values of 5.61 and 2.17, respectively. Similar trend was observed with principal coordinate analysis, wherein, the first and second component accounted to 8.34 and 3.22% with eigen values of 741.29 and 286.11. The similarity index values ranged from 0.50 to 0.87 for the possible 8778 combinations from 133 genotypes, of which 8069 combinations exhibited less/moderate genetic similarity indicating the availability of sufficient genetic diversity in the experimental material and hence their value in the genetic improvement of sugarcane. Dissimilarity analysis using DARwin of 133 genotypes could distinguish two major clusters and into five subclusters and the results matched with those of the population structure which also showed five subpopulations. The bigger group SP1 was predominantly comprised of clones developed at the main sugarcane-breeding place in India, located at Coimbatore. The subpopulation SP4 was formed largely with clones from research stations other than at Coimbatore and interspecific hybrids, while SP5 comprised of clones of early origin. These observations were similar to the radial tree based on the DARwin software in that 81.95% of the genotypes of each cluster were similar in the two analyses. The results thus showed that location and time of origin were two major factors that contributed to diversity. Based on analysis of molecular variance, subpopulations SP2 and SP4 were more variable from the rest. SP2 (comprising of Co 99008, Co 99006, Co 94012, Co 93023, CoC 671, Co 89034, Co 91003, Co 06022, Co 98017, Co 87044, Co 06018, Co 89003, Co 98014, and Co 86032) exhibited maximum genetic variation, the least gene flow, and the lowest heterozygosity value and would serve as the best group for utilization in genetic improvement. Graphical genotyping (GGT) image of each genotype was distinctly different, indicating the genetic uniqueness of sugarcane genotypes under study as revealed through STMS technology. A core set of 40 genotypes was identified using GGT 2.0 software program for the easiness of harnessing the available genetic diversity of 133 genotypes, through hybridization in sugarcane improvement programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.