Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30073113›Full record

Article3 Biotech2018

Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)/poly(ethylene glycol) scaffolds with different microstructure: the effect on growth of mesenchymal stem cells.

A P Bonartsev, I I Zharkova, V V Voinova, E S Kuznetsova, V A Zhuikov, T K Makhina, V L Myshkina, D M Potashnikova, D V Chesnokova, D D Khaydapova and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) 3D-Scaffold-Conduit for Guided Tissue Sprouting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A P Bonartsev1Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-9524
I I Zharkova1Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.
V V Voinova1Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.
E S Kuznetsova1Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.
V A Zhuikov2A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, The Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Ave., 33, bld. 2, Moscow, 119071 Russia.
T K Makhina2A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, The Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Ave., 33, bld. 2, Moscow, 119071 Russia.
V L Myshkina2A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, The Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Ave., 33, bld. 2, Moscow, 119071 Russia.
D M Potashnikova1Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.
D V Chesnokova1Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.
D D Khaydapova3Faculty of Soil Science, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.
G A Bonartseva2A.N. Bach Institute of Biochemistry, The Federal Research Centre "Fundamentals of Biotechnology" of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky Ave., 33, bld. 2, Moscow, 119071 Russia.
K V Shaitan1Faculty of Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie gory, 1, bld. 12, Moscow, 119234 Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Development of biocompatible 3D scaffolds is one of the most important challenges in tissue engineering. In this study, we developed polymer scaffolds of different design and microstructure to study cell growth in them. To obtain scaffolds of various microstructure, e.g., size of pores, we used double- and one-stage leaching methods using porogens with selected size of crystals. A composite of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) (PHB/PEG) was used as polymer biomaterial for scaffolds. The morphology of scaffolds was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy; the Young modulus of scaffolds was measured by rheometry. The ability to support growth of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in scaffolds was studied using the XTT assay; the phenotype of MSC was preliminarily confirmed by flow cytometry and the activity of alkaline phosphatase and expression level of CD45 marker was studied to test possible MSC osteogenic differentiation. The obtained scaffolds had different microstructure: the scaffolds with uniform pore size of about 125 µm (normal pores) and 45 µm (small pores) and scaffolds with broadly distributed pores size from about 50-100 µm. It was shown that PHB/PEG scaffolds with uniform pores of normal size did not support MSCs growth probably due to their marked spontaneous osteogenic differentiation in these scaffolds, whereas PHB/PEG scaffolds with diverse pore size promoted stem cells growth that was not accompanied by pronounced differentiation. In scaffolds with small pores (about 45 µm), the growth of MSC was the lowest and cell growth suppression was only partially related to stem cells differentiation. Thus, apparently, the broadly distributed pore size of PHB/PEG scaffolds promoted MSC growth in them, whereas uniform size of scaffold pores stimulated MSC osteogenic differentiation.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal stem cellsMicrostructurePoly(3-hydroxybutyrate)Poly(ethylene glycol)Scaffolds

Identifiers

PMID30073113
PMCPMC6051946
OpenAlexW2884244818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.