Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30072774›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Stability of graph theoretical measures in structural brain networks in Alzheimer's disease.

Gustav Mårtensson, Joana B Pereira, Patrizia Mecocci, Bruno Vellas, Magda Tsolaki, Iwona Kłoszewska, Hilkka Soininen, Simon Lovestone, Andrew Simmons, Giovanni Volpe and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. (Dis-)Connected Dots in Dementia with Lewy Bodies-A Systematic Review of Connectivity Studies.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Gustav MårtenssonDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. gustav.martensson@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0002-6100-991X
Joana B PereiraDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Patrizia MecocciInstitute of Gerontology and Geriatrics, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Bruno VellasINSERM U 558, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Magda Tsolaki3rd Department of Neurology, Memory and Dementia Unit, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Iwona KłoszewskaMedical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Hilkka SoininenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Neurology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Simon LovestoneDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Andrew SimmonsNIHR Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health, London, UK.
Giovanni VolpeDepartment of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eric WestmanDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3115-2977
Karolinska Institutet · SEWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRInserm · FRMedical University of Lodz · PLUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Perugia · ITWarneford Hospital · GB

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph analysis has become a popular approach to study structural brain networks in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, reported results across similar studies are often not consistent. In this paper we investigated the stability of the graph analysis measures clustering, path length, global efficiency and transitivity in a cohort of AD (N = 293) and control subjects (N = 293). More specifically, we studied the effect that group size and composition, choice of neuroanatomical atlas, and choice of cortical measure (thickness or volume) have on binary and weighted network properties and relate them to the magnitude of the differences between groups of AD and control subjects. Our results showed that specific group composition heavily influenced the network properties, particularly for groups with less than 150 subjects. Weighted measures generally required fewer subjects to stabilize and all assessed measures showed robust significant differences, consistent across atlases and cortical measures. However, all these measures were driven by the average correlation strength, which implies a limitation of capturing more complex features in weighted networks. In binary graphs, significant differences were only found in the global efficiency and transitivity measures when using cortical thickness measures to define edges. The findings were consistent across the two atlases, but no differences were found when using cortical volumes. Our findings merits future investigations of weighted brain networks and suggest that cortical thickness measures should be preferred in future AD studies if using binary networks. Further, studying cortical networks in small cohorts should be complemented by analyzing smaller, subsampled groups to reduce the risk that findings are spurious.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCerebral CortexModels, NeurologicalNerve NetAgedFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID30072774
PMCPMC6072788
OpenAlexW2883196872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.