Trial reportThe oncologist2019
Alternate Endpoints for Phase II Trials in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of meta-analyses assessing the validity of tumour response endpoints as surrogates for progression-free or overall survival in cancer.British journal of cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Neuroendocrine tumours through an epigenetic lens: Emerging insights for diagnosis and treatment.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn phase II trials for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), the objective response rate (ORR) is traditionally used as a primary endpoint. However, the validity of the ORR as a primary endpoint has never been systematically examined. Therefore, a literature-based analysis of phase II trials for NETs was performed to identify valid alternative endpoints for predicting median progression-free survival (PFS) in clinical trials for NETs. MATERIALS AND
methodsPhase II trials of medical treatment for advanced NETs were identified based on a systematic search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.
resultsA total of 22 trials were identified, and 1,310 patients and 27 treatment arms were included in the analysis. There was no significant relationship between the ORR and median PFS (
conclusionThe results of the present analysis indicate that the ORR is not significantly correlated with median PFS and suggest that 12-month PFS rates are good alternate endpoints for screening phase II trials for NETs. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Phase II trials are screening trials that seek to identify agents with sufficient activity to continue development. Thus, earlier endpoints are preferable, and the objective response rate (ORR) has been traditionally used as a surrogate endpoint in phase II trials for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, the present study showed that the ORR was not significantly correlated with median progression-free survival (PFS). On the other hand, the 12-month PFS rate showed very strong correlation with median PFS and is considered a good alternate endpoint for screening phase II trials for NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.