Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30072368›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Arterial Spin-Labeling in Children with Brain Tumor: A Meta-Analysis.

A F Delgado, F De Luca, P Hanagandi, D van Westen, A F Delgado

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Advanced pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Arterial Spin Labeling for Pediatric Central Nervous System Diseases: Techniques and Clinical Applications.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multidelay ASL of the pediatric brain.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gadolinium Deposition Safety: Seeking the Patient's Perspective.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A F DelgadoFrom the Departments of Clinical Neuroscience (Anna F.D.) anna.falk-delgado@sll.se.ORCID 0000-0003-4389-5089
F De LucaFaculty of Medicine and Surgery (F.D.L.), School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University "G. d'Annunzio," Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7131-3248
P HanagandiNeuroradiology (P.H.), Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3654-8329
D van WestenFaculty of Medicine (D.v.W.), Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8649-9874
A F DelgadoDepartment of Surgical Sciences (Alberto F.D.), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9107-5814

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe value of arterial spin-labeling in a pediatric population has not been assessed in a meta-analysis. PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of arterial spin-labeling-derived cerebral blood flow to discriminate low- and high-grade tumors. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library were used. STUDY SELECTION: Pediatric patients with arterial spin-labeling MR imaging with verified neuropathologic diagnoses were included. DATA ANALYSIS: Relative CBF and absolute CBF and tumor grade were extracted, including sequence-specific information. Mean differences in CBF between low- and high-grade tumors were calculated. Study quality was assessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were aggregated using the bivariate summary receiver operating characteristic curve model. Heterogeneity was explored with meta-regression and subgroup analyses. The study protocol was published at PROSPERO (CRD42017075055). Eight studies encompassing 286 pediatric patients were included. The mean differences in absolute CBF were 29.62 mL/min/100 g (95% CI, 10.43-48.82 mL/min/100 g), I LIMITATIONS: Included tumor types, analysis method, and original data varied among included studies.

conclusionsArterial spin-labeling-derived CBF measures showed high diagnostic accuracy for discriminating low- and high-grade tumors in pediatric patients with brain tumors. The relative CBF showed less variation among studies than the absolute CBF.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationBrain NeoplasmsChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuroimagingROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificitySpin LabelsSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID30072368
PMCPMC7410530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.