Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30072367›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

Feasibility of a Synthetic MR Imaging Sequence for Spine Imaging.

M I Vargas, M Drake-Pérez, B M A Delattre, J Boto, K-O Lovblad, S Boudabous

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M I VargasFrom the Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (M.I.V., J.B., K.-O.L.), Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland maria.i.vargas@hcuge.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6571-5336
M Drake-PérezDepartment of Radiology (M.D.-P.), University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-2885
B M A DelattreDivision of Radiology (B.M.A.D., S.B.), Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-3588
J BotoFrom the Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (M.I.V., J.B., K.-O.L.), Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1448-861X
K-O LovbladFrom the Division of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology (M.I.V., J.B., K.-O.L.), Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2768-9779
S BoudabousDivision of Radiology (B.M.A.D., S.B.), Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0516-4613

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeSynthetic MR imaging is a method that can produce multiple contrasts from a single sequence, as well as quantitative maps. Our aim was to determine the feasibility of a synthetic MR image for spine imaging. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty-eight patients with clinical indications of infectious, degenerative, and neoplastic disease underwent an MR imaging of the spine (11 cervical, 8 dorsal, and 19 lumbosacral MR imaging studies). The SyntAc sequence, with an acquisition time of 5 minutes 40 seconds, was added to the usual imaging protocol consisting of conventional sagittal T1 TSE, T2 TSE, and STIR TSE.

resultsSynthetic T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and STIR images were of adequate quality, and the acquisition time was 53% less than with conventional MR imaging. The image quality was rated as "good" for both synthetic and conventional images. Interreader agreement concerning lesion conspicuity was good with a Cohen κ of 0.737. Artifacts consisting of white pixels/spike noise across contrast views, as well as flow artifacts, were more common in the synthetic sequences, particularly in synthetic STIR. There were no statistically significant differences between readers concerning the scores assigned for image quality or lesion conspicuity.

conclusionsOur study shows that synthetic MR imaging is feasible in spine imaging and produces, in general, good image quality and diagnostic confidence. Furthermore, the non-negligible time savings and the ability to obtain quantitative measurements as well as to generate several contrasts with a single acquisition should promise a bright future for synthetic MR imaging in clinical routine.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArtifactsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingSpinal Cord DiseasesSpinal DiseasesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30072367
PMCPMC7655273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.