ArticleAcademic radiology2019
Convolutional Neural Network Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Mammographic Dataset.
Article in Academic radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Current state of mammography-based artificial intelligence for future breast cancer risk prediction: a systematic review.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Mammography-Based Future Breast Cancer Risk Prediction: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2024Pooled it
- Breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning: a systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of vitamin D supplementation on a deep learning-based mammographic evaluation in SWOG S0812.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Trial
- Fully connected neural network model for predicting postthrombotic syndrome in patients with deep vein thrombosis.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Article
- A deep learning framework to stratify Nottingham histologic grade 2 breast tumors based on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Clinical Application of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging: Current Insights, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Review
- Review
- Deep learning prediction of mammographic breast density using screening data.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of breastfeeding, antibiotics, and indoor environments in preschool children atopic dermatitis through machine learning and hygiene hypothesis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Future of Breast Cancer Organized Screening Program Through Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Review of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer Risk and Prevention: A Step Forward.Cancers · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Approaches with Digital Mammography for Evaluating Breast Cancer Risk, a Narrative Review.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- Beyond Breast Density: Risk Measures for Breast Cancer in Multiple Imaging Modalities.Radiology · 2023Review
- Overview of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Medical Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Machine learning algorithms to uncover risk factors of breast cancer: insights from a large case-control study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Models for Automated Assessment of Breast Density Using Multiple Mammographic Image Types.Cancers · 2022Article
- Comparison of Classification Success Rates of Different Machine Learning Algorithms in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2022Article
- Use of a convolutional neural network-based mammographic evaluation to predict breast cancer recurrence among women with hormone receptor-positive operable breast cancer.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
RATIONALE AND
objectivesWe propose a novel convolutional neural network derived pixel-wise breast cancer risk model using mammographic dataset. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn institutional review board approved retrospective case-control study of 1474 mammographic images was performed in average risk women. First, 210 patients with new incidence of breast cancer were identified. Mammograms from these patients prior to developing breast cancer were identified and made up the case group [420 bilateral craniocaudal mammograms]. The control group consisted of 527 patients without breast cancer from the same time period. Prior mammograms from these patients made up the control group [1054 bilateral craniocaudal mammograms]. A convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was designed for pixel-wise breast cancer risk prediction. Briefly, each mammogram was normalized as a map of z-scores and resized to an input image size of 256 × 256. Then a contracting and expanding fully convolutional CNN architecture was composed entirely of 3 × 3 convolutions, a total of four strided convolutions instead of pooling layers, and symmetric residual connections. L2 regularization and augmentation methods were implemented to prevent overfitting. Cases were separated into training (80%) and test sets (20%). A 5-fold cross validation was performed. Software code was written in Python using the TensorFlow module on a Linux workstation with NVIDIA GTX 1070 Pascal GPU.
resultsThe average age of patients between the case and the control groups was not statistically different [case: 57.4years (SD, 10.4) and control: 58.2years (SD, 10.9), p = 0.33]. Breast Density (BD) was significantly higher in the case group [2.39 (SD, 0.7)] than the control group [1.98 (SD, 0.75), p < 0.0001]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, both CNN pixel-wise mammographic risk model and BD were significant independent predictors of breast cancer risk (p < 0.0001). The CNN risk model showed greater predictive potential [OR = 4.42 (95% CI, 3.4-5.7] compared to BD [OR = 1.67 (95% CI, 1.4-1.9). The CNN risk model achieved an overall accuracy of 72% (95%CI, 69.8-74.4) in predicting patients in the case group.
conclusionNovel pixel-wise mammographic breast evaluation using a CNN architecture can stratify breast cancer risk, independent of the BD. Larger dataset will likely improve our model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.