ReviewTechnology in cancer research & treatment2018
Navigation Systems for Treatment Planning and Execution of Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation.
Review in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of stereotactic optical navigation for needle positioning in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Navigation and Robotics in Interventional Oncology: Current Status and Future Roadmap.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- New Developments in Image-Guided Percutaneous Irreversible Electroporation of Solid Tumors.Current oncology reports · 2023Review
- Safety and Feasibility of Analgosedation for Electrochemotherapy of Liver Lesions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Image-guided percutaneous ablation for lung malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Stereotactic navigation versus ultrasound guidance in placing IRE applicators in a liver phantom.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Accuracy of Electrode Placement in IRE Treatment with Navigated Guidance.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Article
- Robotics in Interventional Radiology: Review of Current and Future Applications.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of navigational systems has the potential to improve percutaneous interventions. The accuracy of ablation probe placement can be increased and radiation doses reduced. Two different types of systems can be distinguished, tracking systems and robotic systems. This review gives an overview of navigation devices for clinical application and summarizes first findings in the implementation of navigation in percutaneous interventions using irreversible electroporation. Because of the high number of navigation systems, this review focuses on commercially available ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.