ArticleGenes2018
A Model Stacking Framework for Identifying DNA Binding Proteins by Orchestrating Multi-View Features and Classifiers.
Article in Genes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- SNARER: new molecular descriptors for SNARE proteins classification.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- The Characterization of Structure and Prediction for Aquaporin in Tumour Progression by Machine Learning.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- A sequence-based multiple kernel model for identifying DNA-binding proteins.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Deep4mC: systematic assessment and computational prediction for DNA N4-methylcytosine sites by deep learning.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
- Identify DNA-Binding Proteins Through the Extreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- HMMPred: Accurate Prediction of DNA-Binding Proteins Based on HMM Profiles and XGBoost Feature Selection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020Article
- PredDBP-Stack: Prediction of DNA-Binding Proteins from HMM Profiles using a Stacked Ensemble Method.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- FKRR-MVSF: A Fuzzy Kernel Ridge Regression Model for Identifying DNA-Binding Proteins by Multi-View Sequence Features via Chou's Five-Step Rule.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- DP-BINDER: machine learning model for prediction of DNA-binding proteins by fusing evolutionary and physicochemical information.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2019Article
- An improved deep learning method for predicting DNA-binding proteins based on contextual features in amino acid sequences.PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nowadays, various machine learning-based approaches using sequence information alone have been proposed for identifying DNA-binding proteins, which are crucial to many cellular processes, such as DNA replication, DNA repair and DNA modification. Among these methods, building a meaningful feature representation of the sequences and choosing an appropriate classifier are the most trivial tasks. Disclosing the significances and contributions of different feature spaces and classifiers to the final prediction is of the utmost importance, not only for the prediction performances, but also the practical clues of biological experiment designs. In this study, we propose a model stacking framework by orchestrating multi-view features and classifiers (MSFBinder) to investigate how to integrate and evaluate loosely-coupled models for predicting DNA-binding proteins. The framework integrates multi-view features including Local_DPP, 188D, Position-Specific Scoring Matrix (PSSM)_DWT and autocross-covariance of secondary structures(AC_Struc), which were extracted based on evolutionary information, sequence composition, physiochemical properties and predicted structural information, respectively. These features are fed into various loosely-coupled classifiers such as SVM and random forest. Then, a logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the contributions of these individual classifiers and to make the final prediction. When performing on the training dataset PDB1075, the proposed method achieves an accuracy of 83.53%. On the independent dataset PDB186, the method achieves an accuracy of 81.72%, which outperforms many existing methods. These results suggest that the framework is able to orchestrate various predicted models flexibly with good performances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.