Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30071146›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2018

A randomized phase II trial of MOVING ON: An intervention to increase exercise outcome expectations among breast cancer survivors.

Rachel Hirschey, Gretchen Kimmick, Marilyn Hockenberry, Ryan Shaw, Wei Pan, Christina Page, Isaac Lipkus

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Barriers and facilitators to the engagement of physical activity among Black and African American cancer survivors during and after treatments.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Healthy Behaviors: Prevalence of Uptake Among Cancer Survivors.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel HirscheyUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8358-0650
Gretchen KimmickDuke University Medical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
Marilyn HockenberryDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Ryan ShawDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Wei PanDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Christina PageDuke Women's Cancer Care, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Isaac LipkusDuke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University · USDuke Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWomen's Cancer Center of Nevada · US

Funding

INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING &MANAGING CHRONIC ILLNESST32NR007091 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Cheryl L Giscombe, Cathi Barbra Propper · 1996 to 2026
$11.8M
Intervention to Increase Exercise among Breast Cancer SurvivorsF31NR015690 · NINR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HIRSCHEY, RACHEL · 2015 to 2016
$72k
NINR NIH HHS 1F31NR015690-0NINR NIH HHS 2T32NR007091NINR NIH HHS F31 NR015690NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of the study is to test theoretical intervention fidelity and feasibility of MOVING ON, a self-directed, home-based, randomized controlled trial to increase exercise outcome expectations (OEs) (what one expects to obtain or avoid as a result of a behavior or lack thereof), among breast cancer survivors.

methodStage Ia to IIb survivors (n = 60) were given the MOVING ON intervention or control booklet. Data were collected through online surveys and an accelerometer at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postintervention. Fidelity was measured by questions assessing participant perceptions of MOVING ON (score ≥2) and direction of intervention effects. Feasibility was measured by recruitment rate (target of 60 participants in 6 months), retention (total attrition <17%), and acquisition of accelerometer data (% ≥subjective exercise data obtained). Analyses consisted of descriptive statistics, mixed models, and content analysis.

resultsFidelity met a priori criteria (mean = 3.31, SD = 0.87). Outcome expectations increased 0.01 points, and weekly steps increased by 970 every 4 weeks in the intervention arm compared to the control arm. All effect sizes were small, ranging from 0.01 to 0.09. Target enrollment, achieved in 17 weeks, met a priori feasibility criteria. Retention (66%) and accelerometer data acquisition (60%) (compared to 73% of subjective exercise data) did not.

conclusionMOVING ON influenced OEs as intended and was well received by participants. A fully powered study, of this low-cost, easy-to-implement intervention, is warranted. Intervention and measurement strategies used in MOVING ON can be incorporated in any study targeting OEs as a mediator of exercise or collecting exercise data with an accelerometer.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultBreast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsExerciseFemaleGoalsHealth BehaviorHumansMiddle AgedPhysical EnduranceQuality of LifeSelf EfficacyTreatment Outcomebehavior changebreast cancercancercancer survivorexerciseoutcome expectationsphysical activitysurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID30071146
PMCPMC6684254
OpenAlexW2886588009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.