ArticlePloS one2018
Uptake and tissue accretion of orally administered free carboxylic acid as compared to ethyl ester form of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in the rat.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Compound-Specific Isotope Analysis as a Potential Approach for Investigation of Cerebral Accumulation of Docosahexaenoic Acid: Previous Milestones and Recent Trends.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Protective activities of distinct omega-3 enriched oils are linked to their ability to upregulate specialized pro-resolving mediators.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to compare the plasma exposure and tissue accretion of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in response to oral dosing of free carboxylic acid (OM3CA) and ethyl ester (OM3EE) forms. MATERIALS AND
methodsSixteen adult male Wistar rats, fed a low-fat, carbohydrate-rich, standard chow diet, were chronically catheterized and gavaged for 5 consecutive days with either OM3CA (n = 9) or OM3EE (n = 7), the last day fasted overnight and spiked respectively with either 14C-DHA or 14C-DHA-ethyl ester (14C-DHA-EE) tracers. Appearance of 14C-labelled plasma polar and neutral lipids over 4 h and retention of 14C-activity (R) in the tissues at 4 h were measured.
resultsCompared to OM3EE, OM3CA resulted in 2- and 3-fold higher areas under the plasma 14C-labelled polar and neutral lipid curves (exposures), respectively, as well as, higher R in all tissues examined. For both OM3CA and OM3EE, R varied in a tissue specific manner; highest in liver, followed by red skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, brain and white skeletal muscle. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that R in each tissue (except liver) was dependent on polar lipid exposure alone (r2>0.87 and P<0.001), but not neutral lipid exposure, and furthermore this dependence was indistinguishable for OM3CA and OM3EE. In the liver, R was found to be dependent on both polar and neutral lipid exposures (r2 = 0.97, P<0.001), with relative contributions of 85±2% and 15±2%, respectively. As for the other tissues, these dependencies were indistinguishable for OM3CA and OM3EE.
conclusionThe present results, in fasted low-fat diet fed rats, are consistent with higher oral bioavailability of OM3CA versus OM3EE forms of DHA. Once DHA has entered the circulation, the tissue distribution is independent of the dosed form and uptake in the skeletal muscle, fat and brain is driven by the polar pools of DHA in plasma, while DHA accretion in liver is supplied by both polar and neutral plasma lipids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.